Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: An exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Yongjun [1 ]
Xie, Lei [2 ]
Zhang, Ling [3 ]
Huang, Lingyan [4 ]
Lin, Yue [1 ]
Su, Yue [5 ]
AmirReza, Shahtahmassebi [1 ]
He, Shan [6 ]
Zhu, Congmou [1 ]
Li, Sinan [1 ]
Gan, Muye [1 ,7 ]
Huang, Lu [1 ,7 ]
Wang, Ke [1 ,7 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Chen, Xinming [9 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Agr Remote Sensing & Informat Technol, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Shuzhi Space Planning Design Co Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ City Coll, Business Coll, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[5] Anhui Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hefei 230036, Peoples R China
[6] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[7] Zhejiang Univ, Rural Dev Acad, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[8] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Urban Land Resources Monitoring & Simulat, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
[9] Terr Consolidat Ctr Zhejiang Prov, Dept Nat Resources Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 310007, Peoples R China
关键词
Rural landscapes; Cultural ecosystem services; Social media; Public preferences; Landscape characteristics; AESTHETIC QUALITY; DEMAND; PHOTOGRAPHS; ATTRIBUTES; PERCEPTION; CONSENSUS; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115487
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rural landscapes offer a variety of cultural ecosystem services (CESs). However, the relationship between rural landscape characteristics and different CESs is still poorly understood. Therefore, this study explored the rural areas of Huzhou city, China, as a case study to assess the main rural landscape characteristics of different CESs based on public preferences. First, 148 scenic spots were classified into four CESs (physical, experiential, intellectual and inspirational), and the public preferences for each scenic spot were determined by combining tourists' scores obtained from social media and government assessment scores. Then, the landscape characteristic indicators were constructed from the natural, infrastructural and sensory perspectives by combining geographic and social media data. Finally, the random forest model was used to evaluate the public preferences for rural landscape characteristics overall and for different CESs. The word frequency analysis showed that, in addition to the nature landscape, infrastructure and service had a strong influence on public preferences. The relationship with rural landscape characteristics varied across different CESs. For physical CESs, the convenience of infrastructure played a greater role than natural landscape characteristics. Experiential CESs, on the other hand, were affected by natural landscape characteristics themselves. Intellectual CESs had higher requirements for both infrastructure and nature. Inspirational CESs included sensory evaluation indicators, in addition to their focus on natural landscape characteristics and infrastructure, indicating that this category of CESs was more concerned with inner experience. The use of social media data has enriched the dimensions of sensory elements and provided new ideas and information supplements for comprehensively understanding different CESs, thus better supporting the management, planning and protection of rural landscapes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: An exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data
    Li, Yongjun
    Xie, Lei
    Zhang, Ling
    Huang, Lingyan
    Lin, Yue
    Su, Yue
    AmirReza, Shahtahmassebi
    He, Shan
    Zhu, Congmou
    Li, Sinan
    Gan, Muye
    Huang, Lu
    Wang, Ke
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Xinming
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 317
  • [2] An Interpretation of Landscape Preferences Based on Geographic and Social Media Data to Understand Different Cultural Ecosystem Services
    Yang, Yuanting
    Duan, Wei
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [3] The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context
    Csurgo, Bernadett
    Smith, Melanie K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 86 : 76 - 86
  • [4] Understanding the dynamic changes in wetland cultural ecosystem services: Integrating annual social media data into the SolVES
    Huang, Sitong
    Tian, Tian
    Zhai, Lingge
    Deng, Lingzhi
    Che, Yue
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 156
  • [5] Mining Social Media Data to Capture Urban Park Visitors' Perception of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Factors
    Chen, Yaxin
    Hong, Chuanchun
    Yang, Yifan
    Li, Jiaxin
    Wang, Yu
    Zheng, Tianyu
    Zhang, Yinke
    Shao, Feng
    De Meo, Isabella
    [J]. FORESTS, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [6] Cultural ecosystem services evaluation using geolocated social media data: a review
    Zhang, Hongmei
    Huang, Ruihong
    Zhang, Yechen
    Buhalis, Dimitrios
    [J]. TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, 2022, 24 (4-5) : 646 - 668
  • [7] The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania
    Hartel, Tibor
    Fischer, Joern
    CYmpeanu, Claudia
    Milcu, Andra Ioana
    Hanspach, Jan
    Fazey, Ioan
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (02):
  • [8] Understanding the sentiment associated with cultural ecosystem services using images and text from social media
    Havinga, Ilan
    Marcos, Diego
    Bogaart, Patrick
    Tuia, Devis
    Hein, Lars
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [9] Classifying and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Data
    Mouttaki, Ikram
    Bagdanaviciute, Ingrida
    Maanan, Mohamed
    Erraiss, Mohammed
    Rhinane, Hassan
    Maanan, Mehdi
    [J]. WETLANDS, 2022, 42 (07)
  • [10] Classifying and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Data
    Ikram Mouttaki
    Ingrida Bagdanavičiūtė
    Mohamed Maanan
    Mohammed Erraiss
    Hassan Rhinane
    Mehdi Maanan
    [J]. Wetlands, 2022, 42