The Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised in a Community Sample

被引:74
|
作者
Uzieblo, Katarzyna [1 ]
Verschuere, Bruno [2 ]
Van den Bussche, Eva [3 ]
Crombez, Geert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Lessius, Dept Appl Psychol, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
psychopathy; self-report measures; validity; community; Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised; Levenson's Self-Report Measure for Psychopathy; Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; HIGH-FUNCTIONING AUTISM; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; SELF-REPORT; TRAITS; VALIDATION; EMPATHY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/1073191109356544
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) has revealed two factors: Fearless Dominance, and Self-Centered Impulsivity. This study examined the validity of these PPI-R factors in a community sample (N = 675). First, confirmatory factor analyses did not support the two-factor structure. Second, the PPI-R factors showed good convergent and discriminant validity with two other self-report measures of psychopathy, that is, the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory and Levenson's Self-Report of Psychopathy. Third, PPI-R factors exhibited good external validity in relation to various theoretically relevant correlates. The results indicate that the PPI-R factors have good convergent, discriminant, and external validity, but confirmatory factor analysis raises concerns about the robustness of the two-factor structure.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Careless Responding With the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised Validity Scales
    Marcus, David K.
    Church, Abere Sawaqdeh
    O'Connell, Debra
    Lilienfeld, Scott O.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2018, 25 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [2] Concurrent Validity of The Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised and The Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version in an Australian Offender Sample
    Hughes, Melissa A.
    Stout, Julie C.
    Dolan, Mairead C.
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2013, 40 (07) : 802 - 813
  • [3] Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R)
    Koglin, Ute
    Petermann, Franz
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2009, 57 (02): : 137 - 139
  • [4] Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised
    Eichenbaum, Alexander E.
    Marcus, David K.
    French, Brian F.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2019, 26 (06) : 1046 - 1058
  • [5] CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY AND THE PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY-REVISED: A Look at Self-Reported Personality Traits
    Ray, James V.
    Weir, John W.
    Poythress, Norman G.
    Rickelm, Angela
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2011, 38 (04) : 375 - 385
  • [6] Examining the Correlates of the Coldheartedness Factor of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised
    Berg, Joanna M.
    Hecht, Lisa K.
    Latzman, Robert D.
    Lilienfeld, Scott O.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 27 (04) : 1494 - 1499
  • [7] Computer equivalency of the psychopathic personality inventory-revised in a nonincarcerated population
    Sandler, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 34 (03) : 399 - 410
  • [8] Examining the Necessity for and Utility of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI- R) Validity Scales
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sellbom, Martin
    Wygant, Dustin B.
    Edens, John F.
    [J]. LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 37 (05) : 312 - 320
  • [9] EVALUATING THE PSYCHOMETRIC EFFECTS AND ASSESSMENT OF INCONSISTENT RESPONDING ON THE PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY-REVISED IN A CORRECTIONAL SAMPLE
    Neo, Bryan
    Sellbom, Martin
    Wygant, Dustin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2019, 33 (05) : 707 - 720
  • [10] Examining the Impact of Gender on the Factor Structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised
    Anestis, Joye C.
    Caron, Kelly M.
    Carbonell, Joyce L.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2011, 18 (03) : 340 - 349