Validating the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in obstetric and gynaecologic resuscitation teams

被引:5
|
作者
Carpini, Joseph A. [1 ]
Calvert, Katrina [2 ]
Carter, Sean [2 ]
Epee-Bekima, Mathias [2 ]
Leung, Yee [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Business Sch, Management & Org Dept, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Western Australian Gynaecol Canc Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Womens & Infants Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
emergencies; feasibility studies; patient safety; psychometrics; simulation training; SIMULATION; VALIDITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13362
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Simulation-based training is an effective method of enhancing the knowledge, skill, and technical abilities of individuals and teams encountering obstetric and gynaecologic emergencies. Simulation may also enhance the non-technical performance of teams resulting in improved patient outcomes. Although simulation-based training is widely recognised as an effective educational approach, issues around feasibility - the lack of simulation experts and malleable outcome measures of team performance - remain critical barriers to their implementation. Aim To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) when used by medical professionals in simulated obstetric and gynaecological emergencies. Methods There were 151 participants (63% female; 60% consultants; 69% no previous simulation-based training) who observed three live high-fidelity obstetric and gynaecological resuscitation simulations and completed the TEAM. Results Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the construct validity of the TEAM, yielding a second-order structure identified by 'leadership', 'teamwork', and 'team management'. Convergent validity was supported by the average item-to-scale total correlation which was 0.75, P < 0.001 and the average analysis of variance extracted (AVE) 0.88. The individual factors also yielded high factor-to-scale total correlations (mean [M] = 0.87), and AVE (M = 0.89). The internal reliability was high for the whole scale (average alpha = 0.92) and across the sub-factors (average alpha = 0.80). The inter-rater reliability was excellent (inter-class correlation coefficient 1 = 0.98). Participants with differing levels of simulation training experience did not significantly differ. Conclusion The TEAM is a viable instrument for the assessment of non-technical performance during simulated obstetric and gynaecologic emergencies, thus enhancing the feasibility of simulation-based training.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 861
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring teamwork performance: Validity testing of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) with clinical resuscitation teams
    Cooper, Simon
    Cant, Robyn
    Connell, Cliff
    Sims, Lyndall
    Porter, Joanne E.
    Symmons, Mark
    Nestel, Debra
    Liaw, Sok Ying
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 101 : 97 - 101
  • [2] Application of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure for Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Han, Sangsoo
    Park, Hye Ji
    Jeong, Won Jung
    Kim, Gi Woon
    Choi, Han Joo
    Moon, Hyung Jun
    Lee, Kyoungmi
    Choi, Hyuk Joong
    Park, Yong Jin
    Cho, Jin Seong
    Lee, Choung Ah
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [3] Improving the non-technical skills of hospital medical emergency teams: The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM™)
    Cant, Robyn P.
    Porter, Joanne E.
    Cooper, Simon J.
    Roberts, Kate
    Wilson, Ian
    Gartside, Christopher
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2016, 28 (06) : 641 - 646
  • [4] Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) for the assessment of non-technical skills during resuscitation: Validation of the French version
    Maignan, Maxime
    Koch, Francois-Xavier
    Chaix, Jordane
    Phellouzat, Pierre
    Binauld, Gery
    Muret, Roselyne Collomb
    Cooper, Simon J.
    Labarere, Jose
    Danel, Vincent
    Viglino, Damien
    Debaty, Guillaume
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 101 : 115 - 120
  • [5] Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: An update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM)
    Cooper, Simon J.
    Cant, Robyn P.
    RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (01) : 31 - 33
  • [6] Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM)
    Cooper, Simon
    Cant, Robyn
    Porter, Joanne
    Sellick, Ken
    Somers, George
    Kinsman, Leigh
    Nestel, Debra
    RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (04) : 446 - 452
  • [7] Reliability and validity testing of team emergency assessment measure in a distributed team context
    Morian, Hanna
    Hargestam, Maria
    Hultin, Magnus
    Jonsson, Hakan
    Jonsson, Karin
    Amoroe, Torben Nordahl
    Creutzfeldt, Johan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Team emergency assessment measure (TEAM) of non-technical skills: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the TEAM tool
    Giugni, Fernando Rabioglio
    Dias, Roger Daglius
    Rodrigues, Caio Godoy
    Pinesi, Henrique Trombini
    Scalabrini-Neto, Augusto
    CLINICS, 2022, 77
  • [9] Review article: Use of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure in the rating of emergency teams' non-technical skills: A mapping review
    Cooper, Simon
    Connell, Clifford
    Cant, Robyn
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2023, : 375 - 383
  • [10] TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training
    Wespi, Rafael
    Schwendimann, Lukas
    Neher, Andrea
    Birrenbach, Tanja
    Schauber, Stefan K.
    Manser, Tanja
    Sauter, Thomas C.
    Kaemmer, Juliane E.
    ADVANCES IN SIMULATION, 2024, 9 (01)