Bounding Analyses of Age-Period-Cohort Effects

被引:32
|
作者
Fosse, Ethan [1 ]
Winship, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Sociol, Toronto, ON M5S 2J4, Canada
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Sociol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Age-period-cohort (APC) models; Identification problem; Cohort analysis; Causal inference; Bounding analysis; PROSTATE-CANCER MORTALITY; STATES CHURCH ATTENDANCE; INTRINSIC ESTIMATOR; UNITED-STATES; TIME TRENDS; CONSTRAINED ESTIMATORS; ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK; VERBAL-ABILITY; SECULAR TRENDS; FUTILE QUEST;
D O I
10.1007/s13524-019-00801-6
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
For more than a century, researchers from a wide range of disciplines have sought to estimate the unique contributions of age, period, and cohort (APC) effects on a variety of outcomes. A key obstacle to these efforts is the linear dependence among the three time scales. Various methods have been proposed to address this issue, but they have suffered from either ad hoc assumptions or extreme sensitivity to small differences in model specification. After briefly reviewing past work, we outline a new approach for identifying temporal effects in population-level data. Fundamental to our framework is the recognition that it is only the slopes of an APC model that are unidentified, not the nonlinearities or particular combinations of the linear effects. One can thus use constraints implied by the data along with explicit theoretical claims to bound one or more of the APC effects. Bounds on these parameters may be nearly as informative as point estimates, even with relatively weak assumptions. To demonstrate the usefulness of our approach, we examine temporal effects in prostate cancer incidence and homicide rates. We conclude with a discussion of guidelines for further research on APC effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1975 / 2004
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The shapley value of age-period-cohort effects
    Bovi, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) : 297 - 317
  • [2] Age-period-cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults
    An, R.
    Xiang, X.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 141 : 163 - 169
  • [3] Clarifying assumptions in age-period-cohort analyses and validating results
    Masters, Ryan
    Powers, Daniel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [4] Age-period-cohort modeling
    Rutherford, Mark J.
    Lambert, Paul C.
    Thompson, John R.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (04): : 606 - 627
  • [5] CONSTRAINTS IN RANDOM EFFECTS AGE-PERIOD-COHORT MODELS
    Luo, Liying
    Hodges, James S.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 50, 2020, 50 (01): : 276 - 317
  • [6] Advances in age-period-cohort analysis
    Smith, Herbert L.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (03) : 287 - 296
  • [7] Comparative age-period-cohort analysis
    Rosenberg P.S.
    Miranda-Filho A.
    Whiteman D.C.
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23 (1)
  • [8] Age-period-cohort models in Stata
    Sasieni, Peter D.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (01): : 45 - 60
  • [9] Autoregressive age-period-cohort models
    Lee, WC
    Lin, RS
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [10] Age, period, and cohort effects in adult lifetime asthma prevalence in California: an application of hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis
    Ryan-Ibarra, Suzanne
    Milet, Meredith
    Lutzker, Liza
    Rodriguez, Danielle
    Induni, Marta
    Kreutzer, Rick
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (02) : 87 - 92