Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws

被引:44
|
作者
Kahan, Dan M. [1 ]
Braman, Donald [2 ]
Monahan, John [3 ]
Callahan, Lisa [4 ]
Peters, Ellen [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Law, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Law, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Sch Law, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[4] Policy Res Associates, Delmar, NY USA
[5] Decis Res, Eugene, OR USA
[6] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cultural cognition; Outpateint commitment; Affect; Values; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; SELF-AFFIRMATION; RISK PERCEPTION; COMMUNITY; PREFERENCES; WORLDVIEWS; EMOTION; IMPACT; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263-287, 1997), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 140
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条