Results of staged total cavopulmonary connection for functionally univentricular hearts; comparison of intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit

被引:53
|
作者
Robbers-Visser, Danielle [1 ]
Miedema, Martijn [2 ]
Nijveld, Aagje [3 ]
Boersma, Eric [4 ]
Bogers, Ad J. J. C. [5 ]
Haas, Felix [6 ]
Helbing, Willem A. [1 ]
Kapusta, Livia [7 ]
机构
[1] Sophia Childrens Univ Hosp, Erasmus MC, Dept Pediat, Div Cardiol, NL-3000 CB Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Cardiol, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Pediat Cardiac Sugery, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Childrens Heart Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Total cavopulmonary connection; Intra-atrial lateral tunnel; Extracardiac conduit; Survival; Arrhythmias; Re-operations; BIDIRECTIONAL GLENN PROCEDURE; FONTAN OPERATION; THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS; VENTRICULAR MORPHOLOGY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.10.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcome of the two co-existing modifications of staged total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) and the extracardiac conduit (ECC). Methods: We included 209 patients after staged TCPC (102 ILT and 107 ECC), operated on between 1988 and 2008. Medical and surgical records were reviewed for (1) patient demographics and cardiac anatomy; (2) pre-Fontan procedures; (3) pre-Fontan haemodynamics and cardiac functional status; (4) operative details; (5) postoperative hospital course; (6) follow-up information on arrhythmias and thrombo-embolic events; (7) post-Fontan interventions; and (8) clinical status at last follow-up until June 2008. Results: Median follow-up duration was 4.3 years (interquartile range 1.5-7.4 years). At 6-year follow-up, freedom from Fontan failure (i.e., mortality or re-operations for Fontan failure) was 83% for the ILT and 79% for the ECC groups (p=0.6); freedom from late reoperations (other than re-operations for Fontan failure) was 79% for the ILT and the ECC groups and freedom from arrhythmias was 83% for the ILT, and 92% for the ECC groups (p = 0.022). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified intensive care unit stay and cardiopulmonary bypass time as risk factors for Fontan failure, but they were not strong predictors. Right ventricular morphology was identified as a risk factor for arrhythmias. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic events was low with no difference between the ILT and the ECC groups, and irrespective of the postoperative use of anticoagulant or anti-platelet aggregation therapy. At most recent follow-up, sinus rhythm was present in 70% of patients; in 23% of the patients, ventricular function was found to be moderately or severely impaired at echocardiography. Conclusions: Outcome after staged ILT- and ECC-type Fontan operations is good, with comparable freedom from late re-operations and freedom from Fontan failure at 6-year follow-up. The incidence of arrhythmias was significantly lower in the ECC group. Right ventricular morphology was identified as a risk factor for arrhythmias. (C) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 941
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Staged total cavopulmonary connection: serial comparison of intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit taking account of current surgical adaptations
    van den Bosch, Eva
    Bossers, Sjoerd S. M.
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    Robbers-Visser, Danielle
    van Dijk, Arie P. J.
    Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
    Breur, Hans M. P. J.
    Haas, Felix
    Kapusta, Livia
    Helbing, Willem A.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 29 (03) : 453 - 460
  • [2] Intracardiac Cavopulmonary Connection in Patients with Univentricular Heart Using Intra-atrial Lateral Tunnel and Intra-atrial Conduit Techniques
    Maluf, Miguel A.
    Carvalho, Antonio C.
    Carvalho, Werther B.
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2010, 13 (06): : E362 - E369
  • [3] Mid-term hemodynamic comparison of extracardiac conduit and intra-atrial lateral tunnel total cavopulmonary connections
    Ishikawa, S
    Nakamura, T
    Nakamura, M
    Ushinohama, H
    Sagawa, KI
    Kado, HA
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 743 - 743
  • [4] Mid-term surgical results of total cavo-pulmonary connection: Comparison between the intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit methods
    Nakano, T
    Kado, HA
    Shiokawa, Y
    Fukae, K
    Miyamoto, K
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 709 - 710
  • [5] Fluid dynamic comparison of intra-atrial and extracardiac total cavopulmonary connections
    Lardo, AC
    Webber, SA
    Friehs, I
    del Nido, PJ
    Cape, EG
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (04): : 697 - 704
  • [6] Total Cavopulmonary Connection With Innovative Combined Lateral Tunnel and Extracardiac Conduit in Heterotaxy Syndrome
    Hsu, Kang-Hong
    Chang, Chung-I
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (05): : 1907 - 1908
  • [7] Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan procedure
    Katogi, Toshiyuki
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 60 (12) : 792 - 795
  • [8] Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan procedure
    Toshiyuki Katogi
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012, 60 (12) : 792 - 795
  • [9] Total Cavopulmonary Connection:Lateral Tunnel Anastomosis or Extracardiac Conduit?——an Analysis of 114 Consecutive Patients
    Klaus Valeske
    Matia Muller
    Dietmer Schranz
    Hakan Akinturk
    ChineseMedicalSciencesJournal, 2009, 24 (02) : 76 - 80
  • [10] Results of extracardiac conduit total cavopulmonary connection in 500 patients
    Spray, T.
    Dr Nakano
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 48 (06) : 832 - 832