LEO TOLSTOY AND ANDREI PLATONOV'S PROSE OF 1941-1945

Comparative analysis of A. Platonov's wartime stories (1941-1945) and Leo Tolstoy's Sevastopol Stories, War and Peace and Hadji Murat is performed. Items reviewed: 1) Both Red Army fighters in Platonov's works and soldiers in Tolstoy's works identify themselves not with an abstract "Fatherland," but with their local "small motherland." 2) Both for Tolstoy and Platonov, neither skilful strategy nor overpowering armaments become the war decisive factor but every single soldier's courage. The battle often develops as an intersection of planned and unforeseen happenings, and everyone bears his own responsibility in it. 3) Platonov's "truth," like Tolstoy's "providence," is linked to the attacked side and serves as a moral justification of resistance to the aggressor. 4) Platonov, however, like Tolstoy (who speaks as a consistent pacifist in his later works), sees the danger of moral degradation as the result of war, and degradation signs had been notable before the war. Sacrifices (including, in this context, Platonov's own son) are not in vain only if there is better life after the war.