Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients

被引:10
|
作者
Yoon, Han Gyul [1 ]
Ahn, Yong Chan [1 ]
Oh, Dongryul [1 ]
Noh, Jae Myoung [1 ]
Park, Seung Gyu [2 ]
Nam, Heerim [3 ]
Ju, Sang Gyu [1 ]
Kwon, Dongyeol [1 ]
Park, Seyjoon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Daegu 42601, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Seoul 03181, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
acute toxicity; oropharyngeal cancer; proton beam therapy; radiation therapy; survival;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13071549
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is expected to reduce toxicity more effectively than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Because of long waiting before starting IMPT, authors began IMRT first and then determined whether to continue IMRT or to switch into IMPT at time of adaptive re-plan, based on the rival plan comparison in 148 OPC patients. Early clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between IMRT alone and IMRT/IMPT combination groups through propensity score matching method. We found that, with comparable oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles (mucositis and need for analgesic use) were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone. Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks' RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade >= 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p < 0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p = 0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p = 0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade >= 3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score >= 3 was also less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hematologic Toxicity Comparison of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Anal Cancer Patients
    Nelson, Bailey
    Tadesse, Dawit G.
    Sudhoff, Mickaela
    Wang, Kyle
    Meier, Teresa
    Mascia, Anthony
    Kharofa, Jordan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 45 (06): : 264 - 267
  • [2] Hematologic Toxicity Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Anal Cancer Patients
    Nelson, B.
    Tadesse, D.
    Wang, K.
    Meier, T.
    Mascia, A. E.
    Kharofa, J. R., Jr.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E64 - E65
  • [3] Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Arc-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Tang, G.
    Earl, M.
    Luan, S.
    Wang, C.
    Naqvi, S.
    Yu, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [4] Planning comparison between intensity modulated radiation therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in a case of head and neck cancer
    Nguyen, T. T. C.
    Nguyen, B. T.
    Mai, N. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2017 (ICMSE2017), 2018, 983
  • [5] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Rose, CM
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 169 (05): : 285 - 286
  • [6] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Crehange, G.
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (07) : 759 - 768
  • [7] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Truc, G.
    Peignaux, K.
    Crehange, G.
    Lagpeau, E.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIE, 2007, 9 (06) : 417 - 421
  • [8] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Murthy, V
    Horwich, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (16) : 2349 - 2351
  • [9] Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2013, 60 (03): : 81 - 83
  • [10] Proton radiotherapy for ependymoma: Initial clinical outcomes and dose comparisons for intensity modulated radiation with photons, proton radiation, and intensity modulated proton therapy
    Yock, T. I.
    MacDonald, S. M.
    Safai, S.
    Wolfgang, J. A.
    Fullerton, B.
    Trofimov, A.
    Bortfeld, T. R.
    Tarbell, N. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S575 - S576