An environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Living Wall Systems

被引:38
|
作者
Oquendo-Di Cosola, V. [1 ,2 ]
Olivieri, F. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz-Garcia, L. [2 ,3 ]
Bacenetti, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Construct & Technol Architecture, ETS Arquitectura, Avda Juan de Herrera 4, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Innovat & Technol Dev Ctr, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Agroforestry Engn, Av Complutense S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Living Wall Systems; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainability; Green walls; GREEN FACADES; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; VEGETATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109743
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standard approach for evaluating the environmental impacts of products and processes. This paper presents the LCA of Living Wall Systems (LWS), a new technology for greening the building envelope and improve sustainability. Impacts of manufacture, operation, and use of the systems selected, were evaluated through an LCA. LWS are closely related to several environmental benefits, including improved air quality, increased biodiversity, mitigation of heat island effects, and reduced energy consumption due to savings in indoor cooling and heating. Two prototypes have been selected, taking into account the modularity and the use of organic substrate as selection criteria. The systems evaluated were a plastic-based modular system and a felt-based modular system. The inventory data was gathered through the manufacturers. The LCA approach has been used to assess the impact of these solutions by focusing on the construction phase and its contribution to both the energy balance and the entire life cycle of a building. This approach has never been done before for LWS. The study found that out of the two systems through the manufacturing, construction, and maintenance stage of the LCA, the felt-based LWS has an impact on almost 100% of the impact categories analyzed, while plastic-based LWS has the lowest influence on the total environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle energy and environmental assessment of alternative exterior wall systems
    Monteiro, H.
    Freire, F.
    PORTUGAL SB10: SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AFFORDABLE TO ALL - LOW COST SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION, 2010, : 777 - 784
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems
    Ciacci, Luca
    Passarini, Fabrizio
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (22)
  • [3] Comparative life cycle analysis for green facades and living wall systems
    Ottele, Marc
    Perini, Katia
    Fraaij, A. L. A.
    Haas, E. M.
    Raiteri, R.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (12) : 3419 - 3429
  • [4] Life-cycle assessment of the contemporary standardized wall systems
    Kraus, Michal
    Novakova, Petra
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUILDING DEFECTS (BUILDING DEFECTS 2018), 2019, 279
  • [5] Life cycle energy and environmental analysis of partition wall systems in the UK
    Broun, Reza
    Menzies, Gillian F.
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2011, 21 : 864 - 873
  • [6] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A Systems Approach to Environmental Management and Sustainability
    Curran, Mary Ann
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2015, 111 (10) : 26 - 35
  • [7] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
    Weidema, Bo
    Brandao, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 726 - 730
  • [8] Investigating environmental life cycle impacts of active living wall for improved indoor air quality
    Mannan, Mehzabeen
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 208
  • [9] Living wall systems: evaluating life-cycle energy, water and carbon impacts
    Mukunth Natarajan
    Mansour Rahimi
    Shouvik Sen
    Nadine Mackenzie
    Yernar Imanbayev
    Urban Ecosystems, 2015, 18 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Living wall systems: evaluating life-cycle energy, water and carbon impacts
    Natarajan, Mukunth
    Rahimi, Mansour
    Sen, Shouvik
    Mackenzie, Nadine
    Imanbayev, Yernar
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (01) : 1 - 11