Second-line lurbinectedin as a new treatment option for small-cell lung cancer: Preliminary results in real-clinical practice

被引:5
|
作者
Toublanc, Anne-Claire [1 ]
Guecamburu, Marina [1 ]
Veillon, Remi [1 ]
Rosellini, Pietro [1 ,2 ]
Girodet, Pierre-Olivier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zysman, Maeva [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Pulm, Pole Cardiothorac, Bordeaux, France
[2] Ctr Rech Cardiothorac Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, Ctr Rech Cardiothorac Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
关键词
lurbinectedin; safety profile; salvage chemotherapy; small cell lung cancer;
D O I
10.1111/1759-7714.14464
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Few strategies exist for treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) extended-stage after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Lurbinectedin is a novel RNA-polymerase-II inhibitor investigated as a second-line therapy for SCLC. However, its efficacy and safety profile in real clinical practice remain to be determined. Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin in real-life among patients with SCLC previously treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients who received at least one dose of lurbinectedin (3.2 mg/m(2)) between March 2020 and November 2021, in the pulmonary department of Bordeaux University Hospital. Endpoints were time to treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety profile. Results Thirteen patients were included. The median age was 60 years (range: 42-77), seven (54%) were females, nine (69%) having a performance status of 0-1. Lurbinectedin was given as second-line treatment before platinum rechallenge in four (31%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 4.1 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 17%. The median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 2.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.2-3.6). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 1.9 (IQR, 0.1.8) and 4.1 (IQR, 2.0-3.5) months. No significant difference regarding TTD, PFS or OS was found in the two groups according to treatment history or according to chemotherapy-free intervall (CMI) < 1 or & rang;1 month. The most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia, nausea, and anemia in nine (70%) patients. Grade 3 AEs were reported, fatigue, vomiting, nausea, anorexia, and neutropenia. Conclusions Lurbinectedin in real clinical practice could have had a lower efficacy than in phase II trial, but a better hematological and bioclinical tolerance than previously reported. Early relapse after platinum-based chemotherapy seems to have a lower response to lurbinectedin.
引用
收藏
页码:2248 / 2252
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An overview of lurbinectedin as a new second-line treatment option for small cell lung cancer
    Patel, Shetal
    Petty, William Jeffrey
    Sands, Jacob M.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [2] Second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer
    MacCallum C.
    Gillenwater H.H.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2006, 8 (4) : 258 - 264
  • [3] Indirect treatment comparison of lurbinectedin versus other second-line treatments for small-cell lung cancer
    Hanvesakul, Raj
    Rengarajan, Badri
    Naveh, Navit
    Boccuti, Anne
    Park, Julie E.
    Adeyemi, Adekemi
    Caisip, Clyde
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    Wilson, Florence R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [4] Lurbinectedin: A New Treatment Option for Relapsed/Refractory Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Shinn, Lauren T.
    Vo, Katrina A.
    Reeves, David J.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2021, 55 (09) : 1172 - 1179
  • [5] Indirect Treatment Comparison of Lurbinectedin vs. Other Second-Line Treatments for Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Rengarajan, B.
    Hanvesakul, R.
    Stack, C.
    Wilson, F.
    Park, J.
    Adeyemi, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (02): : E18 - E18
  • [6] Topotecan in Second-Line Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer -How it Works in Our Daily Clinical Practice?
    Lourenco Moreira Faria, Ana Luisa
    Bravo, Emilio Macias
    Silva Soares Rocha, Marta Alexandra
    Azevedo Rocha, Isabel Maria
    Pequeno Coelho, Ana Luisa
    Ferreira Araujo, Antonio Manuel
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 5 (02) : 114 - 117
  • [7] Second-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer
    Schmittel, Alexander
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (04) : 631 - 637
  • [8] Optimal drugs for second-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Rossi, Antonio
    Sacco, Paola Claudia
    Sgambato, Assunta
    Casaluce, Francesca
    Santabarbara, Giuseppe
    Palazzolo, Giovanni
    Maione, Paolo
    Gridelli, Cesare
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 17 (07) : 969 - 976
  • [9] Second-line chemotherapy for small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
    Kim, Young Hak
    Mishima, Michiaki
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 37 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [10] EFfectiveness and Safety Profile of Lurbinectedin in Second-Line Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study
    Ganti, A. K.
    Allan, V.
    Merola, D.
    Estrin, A.
    Boccuti, A.
    Rengarajan, B.
    Baratta, C.
    Prince, P.
    Li, W.
    Cao, Y.
    D'Agostino, R. B., Jr.
    Poole, E. M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (11) : S378 - S379