On-site stereomicroscope quality evaluations to estimate white core cutoff lengths using EUS-FNA biopsy sampling with 22-gauge needles

被引:27
|
作者
Masutani, Hironori [1 ]
Okuwaki, Kosuke [1 ]
Kida, Mitsuhiro [1 ]
Yoshida, Tsutomu [2 ]
Imaizumi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Yamauchi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Iwai, Tomohisa [1 ]
Kaneko, Toru [1 ]
Hasegawa, Rikiya [1 ]
Miyata, Eiji [1 ]
Koizumi, Wasaburo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
SOLID LESIONS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; 19-GAUGE NEEDLE; GUIDED FNA; ASPIRATION; ENDOSONOGRAPHERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Although rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) during EUS-guided FNA biopsy (EUS-FNAB) sampling may improve accuracy of pathologic analyses, cytopathologists are not widely available. We calculated the cutoff lengths required for accurate pathologic diagnoses from stereomicroscopically visible white cores (SVWCs) sampled using 22-gauge needles. Methods: Overall, 118 patients with mediastinal or upper abdominal solid masses requiring pathologic diagnoses were included. EUS-FNAB sampling was performed using 22-gauge needles. SVWCs were isolated and measured using stereomicroscopy, and the utility of calculated cutoff lengths in diagnosis was investigated. Results: The procedure success and SVWC sampling rates were both 100%, and the median SVWC length was 10 mm. Pathologic examination identified 75, 31, and 12 patients with pancreatic neoplasms (PNs), subepithelial lesions (SELs), and other lesions, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosing malignancy using EUS-FNAB sampling were 93.1%, 100%, 100%, 69.6%, and 94%, respectively. The final diagnostic accuracy in the entire cohort, PNs, and SELs was 92.4%, 90.7%, and 93.5%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated the overall SVWC cutoff length to be 11 mm (11 mm for PNs, 3.5 mm for SELs). The overall sensitivity according to SVWC cutoff length was 91.4% (87.6% for PNs, 98.8% for SELs). Compared with cutoff length, multivariate analysis confirmed SVWC length to be a stronger independent factor for tissue diagnosis in both groups. Conclusions: Diagnosis improved significantly with SVWC cutoff lengths >= 11 mm. This may be a useful index for endoscopists, particularly where ROSE is unavailable.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Macroscopic on-site magnifier-based evaluation to estimate visible tissue core cut-off lengths using EUS-FNA with 22-gauge needles
    Huang, Jialiang
    Cheng, Guilian
    Wu, Wei
    Xu, Liming
    Xu, Longjiang
    Hu, Duanmin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (04) : 493 - 495
  • [2] Macroscopic on-site magnifier-based evaluation to estimate visible tissue core cut-off lengths using EUS-FNA with 22-gauge needles
    Huang Jialiang
    Cheng Guilian
    Wu Wei
    Xu Liming
    Xu Longjiang
    Hu Duanmin
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2024, 137 (04)
  • [3] On-site Stereo Microscope Quality Evaluations to Estimate White Core Cutoff Lengths Via an Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Pancreatic Neoplasms With 22-Gauge Needles
    Watanabe, M.
    Okuwaki, K.
    Kida, M.
    Masutani, H.
    Iwai, T.
    Imaizumi, H.
    Yamauchi, H.
    Kaneko, T.
    Hasegawa, R.
    Miyata, E.
    Kurosu, T.
    Koizumi, W.
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (10) : 1545 - 1545
  • [4] Objective evaluation of the resistance forces of 22-gauge EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy needles
    Matsunami, Yukitoshi
    Itoi, Takao
    Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Tanaka, Reina
    Tonozuka, Ryosuke
    Mukai, Shuntaro
    Nagai, Kazumasa
    Yamamoto, Kenjiro
    Asai, Yasutsugu
    Kurosawa, Takashi
    Kojima, Hiroyuki
    Minami, Hirohito
    Homma, Toshihiro
    Joyama, Eri
    Sofuni, Atsushi
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2023, 12 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [5] EUS-FNA using 22G nitinol or ProCore needles without on-site cytopathology
    Chong, Charing Ching Ning
    Teoh, Anthony Yuen Bun
    Tang, Raymond Shing Yan
    Chan, Anthony Wing Hung
    Ng, Enders Kwok Wai
    Lai, Paul Bo San
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2018, 7 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [6] HIGH EFFICACY AND SAFETY RATE OF USING A 22-GAUGE EUS-FNA NEEDLE FOR EUS-GUIDED LIQUID BIOPSY FROM PORTAL VEIN FOR CIRCULATING TUMOR CELLS
    Kongkam, Pradermchai
    Prasoppokakorn, Thaninee
    Luangsukrerk, Thanawat
    Oung, Borathchakra
    Tawainak, Pobsook
    Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB522 - AB522
  • [7] "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions
    Attam, Rajeev
    Arain, Mustafa A.
    Bloechl, Stephen J.
    Trikudanathan, Guru
    Munigala, Satish
    Bakman, Yan
    Singh, Maharaj
    Wallace, Timothy
    Henderson, Joseph B.
    Catalano, Marc F.
    Guda, Nalini M.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (06) : 1401 - 1407
  • [8] comparison of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using 25-gauge and 22-gauge core biopsy needles through needle crossover: a prospective, randomized study
    Park, Se Woo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 247 - 248
  • [9] Comparison of EUS-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Core Biopsy Needles Through Needle Cross-Over: a Prospective, Randomized Study
    Park, Se Woo
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Song, Si Young
    Bang, Seungmin
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB545 - AB545
  • [10] EUS-guided core liver biopsy sampling using a 22-gauge fork-tip needle: a prospective blinded trial for histologic and lipidomic evaluation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Bazerbachi, Fateh
    Vargas, Eric J.
    Matar, Reem
    Storm, Andrew C.
    Mounajjed, Taofic M.
    Topazian, Mark D.
    Levy, Michael J.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 90 (06) : 926 - 932