Comparative randomised clinical study of tolerability and efficacy of Rhinomer(R) force 3 versus a reference product in post-operative care of the nasal fossae after endonasal surgery

被引:14
|
作者
Seppey, M [1 ]
Schweri, T [1 ]
Hausler, R [1 ]
机构
[1] INSELSPITAL BERN,RHINOL UNIT,CH-3010 BERN,SWITZERLAND
关键词
endonasal surgery; sea water; washing of the nasal cavities;
D O I
10.1159/000276805
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Twenty-eight patients undergoing rhinologic surgery were enrolled in a clinical study to compare two post-operative cleansing preparations. Patients were asked to wash their nasal fossae for 1 month, either with Rhinomer(R), a cleansing preparation of isotonic, sterile, undiluted sea water, presented in a slightly pressurised bottle with neither CFC nor preservative, or with Prorhinel(R), a marketed solution containing an antiseptic agent. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment beginning 2 days after surgery. Nasal status was assessed by symptoms (blocking nose, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, itching and impaired smell) and rhinologic endoscopy (colour of the nasal mucosa, swelling of the mucosa, secretions, presence of crusts or pus). Patients attended control visits on days 9, 15 and 30 following surgery. They were asked to record symptom intensity and use of a rescue medication (Vibrocil(R), dimetindene 0.25 mg and phenylephrine 2.5 mg/ml) on a diary card. Twenty-six of 28 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis, 14 in the Rhinomer group and 12 in the Prorhinel group. In both groups, intensity of complaints decreased markedly over the study period. No severe adverse drug reactions were reported in either treatment. Evoked complaint frequency was comparable between groups, but patient's and physician's opinion on tolerability was significantly different between treatments, in favour of Rhinomer. In addition, the test preparation was found to be easier to use than Prorhinel. The weekly average frequency of use of the rescue medication was not significantly different between treatments. When both patients and physicians were asked about treatment efficacy, they expressed an opinion significantly more favourable to Rhinomer than to the reference drug. In this study, Rhinomer has shown efficacious results that justify its use in washing of the nasal cavities following endonasal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparing the Efficacy of Alkaline Nasal Douches Versus Decongestant Nasal Drops in Postoperative Care After Septal Surgery: A Randomised Single Blinded Clinical Pilot Study
    Vinod Prabhu
    Anita Pandey
    Duncan Ingrams
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2011, 63 : 159 - 164
  • [2] Comparing the Efficacy of Alkaline Nasal Douches Versus Decongestant Nasal Drops in Postoperative Care After Septal Surgery: A Randomised Single Blinded Clinical Pilot Study
    Prabhu, Vinod
    Pandey, Anita
    Ingrams, Duncan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 63 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [3] Randomized Double Blind Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Ibuprofen and Aceclofenac in Controlling Post-Operative Sequelae after Third Molar Surgery
    Jain N.
    Maria A.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2011, 10 (2) : 118 - 122
  • [4] High flow nasal oxygen after bariatric surgery (OXYBAR), prophylactic post-operative high flow nasal oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial
    Rachel Fulton
    Jonathan E. Millar
    Megan Merza
    Helen Johnston
    Amanda Corley
    Daniel Faulke
    Ivan Rapchuk
    Joe Tarpey
    Philip Lockie
    Shirley Lockie
    John F. Fraser
    Trials, 19
  • [5] Comparative Study on Recovery and Post-Operative Analgesic Efficacy from Fentanyl- Versus Dexmedetomidine-Based Anesthesia in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
    Mohanty, Liza
    Kumar, Ravi
    Tugave, Deepak
    Agrawal, Anagha
    Patel, Sejal
    Tanwar, Monika
    Patil, Lalit
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (SUPPL 4) : S3538 - S3540
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of two post-operative drains: results of a prospectively randomized clinical study in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery
    Schmidt, G.
    Zuschlag, M.
    Gerlinger, C.
    Endrikat, J.
    Mueller, C.
    Gabriel, L.
    Stroeder, L.
    Juhasz-Boess, I
    Solomayer, E. F.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (06) : 1687 - 1692
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of two post-operative drains: results of a prospectively randomized clinical study in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery
    G. Schmidt
    M. Zuschlag
    C. Gerlinger
    J. Endrikat
    C. Müller
    L. Gabriel
    L. Ströder
    I. Juhasz-Böss
    E. F. Solomayer
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 300 : 1687 - 1692
  • [8] Peroral versus intravenous post-operative antibiotics after surgery for complicated appendicitis: protocol for a cluster- randomised cluster-crossover non- inferiority study
    Mohamud, Ahmed Abdirahman
    Kleif, Jakob
    Gogenur, Ismail
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 68 (06):
  • [9] A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and side-effect profile (nausea/vomiting/sedation) of morphine-6-glucuronide versus morphine for post-operative pain relief after major abdominal surgery
    Binning, Alexander R.
    Przesmycki, Krzysztof
    Sowinski, Piotr
    Morrison, Lachlan M. M.
    Smith, Terry W.
    Marcus, Paul
    Lees, James P.
    Dahan, Albert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 15 (04) : 402 - 408
  • [10] Post-operative analgesic efficacy of 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone as an adjuvant in bilateral superficial cervical plexus block for thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia - A comparative randomized clinical study
    Jain, Neena
    Rathee, Ritesh
    Jain, Kavita
    Garg, Deepak K.
    Patodi, Veena
    Khare, Arvind
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (03) : 269 - 276