Reconstruction of lower lip defects after tumor excision:: An aesthetic and functional evaluation

被引:8
|
作者
López, AC
Ruiz, PC
Campo, FJR
Gonzalez, FD
机构
[1] Coreysa Hosp, Ciudad Real, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Princesa Univ Hosp, Dept ENT, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Princesa Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mhn.2000.104949
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
We are presenting a new questionnaire to evaluate the functional and aesthetic aspects after reconstruction of defects of the lower lip resulting from tumor excision. The questionnaire is based on objective parameters with numerical values. The application of the questionnaire is carried out based on 2 different surgical techniques, which have been used in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of La Princesa University Hospital in Madrid. These techniques are used in the reconstruction of surgical defects and concern the location and percentage of the lip resection. These techniques are the rotation-advancement flap by Yu and the rotation-advancement in island flap by Colmenero et al. The defects are located laterally and they include 40% to 60% of the length of the lip, avoiding the commissure. There is also one case with a defect that is almost 100% of the length of the lip. According to the questionnaire, we conclude that in unilateral defects that exceed 50% (up to 70%), Yu's technique provides better results from an aesthetic and functional point of view than Colmenero's technique. In subtotal defects, bilateral Yu flaps provide optimum function, with good position of the scars. This is a technique to be considered when confronted with extensive defects of the lip that do not include the commissures.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the functional and aesthetic results of the reconstruction of the lower lip defects after malignant tumor resection
    Bucur, A
    Nita, T
    Nicolescu, I
    Dinca, O
    Slavescu, D
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 137 - 137
  • [2] The functional and aesthetic reconstruction of lip defects
    Constantinidis, J
    Federspil, P
    Iro, H
    HNO, 2000, 48 (07) : 517 - 526
  • [3] One Stage Aesthetic and Functional Reconstruction of Major Lower Lip Defects
    Elmelegy, Nader
    El Sakka, Dalia Mohamed Mofreh
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 78 (04) : 417 - 420
  • [4] Reconstruction of Extensive Lip and Perioral Defects After Tumor Excision
    Sun, Guowen
    Lu, Mingxing
    Hu, Qingang
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 360 - 362
  • [5] Reconstruction for Defects of the Lower Lip After Tumor Ablation
    Zhai Qin-kai
    Tan Xue-xin
    Jin Zhi-lei
    Wang Xu-kai
    Sun Chang-fu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (02) : 552 - 555
  • [6] Aesthetic and Functional Evaluation of Large Full-Thickness Vermilion and Lower Lip Defects Reconstruction
    Jun, Guo
    Wei, Fei
    Tong, Liu
    Yi, Huang
    Hao, Zhou
    Jun, Li Shuang
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (01) : E36 - E39
  • [7] Z plasty closure of lower lip defects after tumor excision
    Koc, Mustafa Nihat
    Orbay, Hakan
    Uysal, Ahmet Caori
    Uenlue, Ramazan Erkin
    Sensoez, Oemer
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 18 (05) : 1120 - 1124
  • [8] Functional and aesthetic results obtained by modified Bernard reconstruction technique after tumour excision in lower lip cancers
    Tuna, Evrim E. Uensal
    Oeksuezler, Oezguer
    Oezbek, Cem
    Oezdem, Cafer
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (06): : 981 - 987
  • [9] Total lower lip reconstruction, with local flaps, after tumor excision
    Thomaidis, V
    Seretis, K
    Tamiolakis, D
    Karpouzis, A
    Lambropoulou, M
    Papadopoulos, N
    Tsamis, I
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 200 - 200
  • [10] Complications, functional and aesthetic outcome after Reconstruction of lower lip defects - Retrospective Analysis of 100 consecutive Patients
    Faulhaber, J.
    Doobe, G.
    Goerdt, S.
    Koenen, W.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2011, 9 (09): : 751 - 751