Comparison of tests for viable and infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts

被引:0
|
作者
Jenkins, M [1 ]
Trout, JM [1 ]
Higgins, J [1 ]
Dorsch, M [1 ]
Veal, D [1 ]
Fayer, R [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Anim Waste Pathogen Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00436-002-0720-6
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare different assays for viable Cryptosporidium parvum incubated in water at a temperature commonly found in the environment. C. parvum oocysts :were, stored in sterile water for 9 months at 15 degreesC. A sample was removed monthly and analyzed by five different assays to determine oocyst viability. Mouse infection and cell culture showed that C. parvum oocysts remained viable and infectious when stored for 7 months at this temperature. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes directed to ribosomal RNA was also applied to these oocysts. The proportion of FISH-positive oocysts was 70-80% for the first 2 months of storage, decreased and remained nearly constant at 40-50% for 3-7 months, then decreased to 20% by 8 months, and to 0% by 9 months. Amylopectin content and mRNA for amyloglucosidase (CPAG), as measured by RT-PCR, decreased much more rapidly. By 3 months and for the remainder of the incubation period, amylopectin content was 20% of the original amount present in the oocysts. The CPAG RT-PCR signal at 3 months was 50% of that observed after I month storage, 20% at 4 months, and was not detected thereafter. Thus, results from cell culture and mouse infection assay exhibited the best agreement, the FISH assay showed modest agreement with these assays, and CPAG RT-PCR and the amylo-pectin assay displayed marginal agreement with the other three assays.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of tests for viable and infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
    M. Jenkins
    J. Trout
    J. Higgins
    M. Dorsch
    D. Veal
    R. Fayer
    Parasitology Research, 2002, 89 : 1 - 5
  • [2] Cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
    Jaskiewicz, Justyna J.
    Sandlin, Rebecca D.
    Swei, Anisa A.
    Widmer, Giovanni
    Toner, Mehmet
    Tzipori, Saul
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [3] DETECTION OF VIABLE CRYPTOSPORIDIUM-PARVUM OOCYSTS BY PCR
    WAGNERWIENING, C
    KIMMIG, P
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (12) : 4514 - 4516
  • [4] Rapid method for viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts detection
    Chu, X. N.
    Hu, J. Y.
    Guo, H. L.
    Tan, X. L.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2011, 11 (06): : 737 - 744
  • [5] Infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in final reclaimed effluent
    Gennaccaro, AL
    McLaughlin, MR
    Quintero-Betancourt, W
    Huffman, DE
    Rose, JB
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (08) : 4983 - 4984
  • [6] Adhesion kinetics of viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts to quartz surfaces
    Kuznar, ZA
    Elimelech, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (24) : 6839 - 6845
  • [7] A comparison of enumeration techniques for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
    Bennett, JW
    Gauci, MR
    Le Moënic, S
    Schaefer, FW
    Lindquist, HDA
    JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 1999, 85 (06) : 1165 - 1168
  • [8] Immunoassay for viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in turbid environmental water samples
    Call, JL
    Arrowood, M
    Xie, LT
    Hancock, K
    Tsang, VCW
    JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 2001, 87 (01) : 203 - 210
  • [9] Statistical comparison of excystation methods in Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
    Peckova, Radka
    Stuart, Peter D.
    Sak, Bohumil
    Kvetonova, Dana
    Kvac, Martin
    Foitova, Ivona
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2016, 230 : 1 - 5
  • [10] Comparison of viability assays for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts after disinfection
    Joachim, A
    Eckert, E
    Petry, F
    Bialek, R
    Daugschies, A
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2003, 111 (01) : 47 - 57