A randomized controlled trial using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.25% versus 0.0625% bupivacaine in nulliparous labor: effect on analgesia requirement and maternal satisfaction

被引:19
|
作者
Ginosar, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Davidson, E. M. [2 ]
Firman, N. [2 ]
Meroz, Y. [2 ]
Lemmens, H. [2 ]
Weiniger, C. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Mother & Child Anesthesia Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Sch Med,Med Ctr, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
Drug concentration; Epidural; Labor analgesia; Local anesthetics; Patient-controlled epidural analgesia; DILUENT VOLUME; PAIN RELIEF; FENTANYL; INFUSION; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; ROPIVACAINE; ANESTHESIA; DELIVERY; PARTURIENTS; SUFENTANIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.11.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The effect of epidural local anesthetic concentration on analgesic action is still the subject of debate. This study compared the effect of a four-fold change in concentration of bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor. Methods: Nulliparous women in early active labor were recruited. All women received analgesic drugs via a lumbar epidural catheter, and all received fentanyl 1 mu g/kg with the epidural induction dose and no further opioids throughout the study. Patients were randomized to receive either a 5-mL bolus followed by a 5-mL/h infusion of concentrated (0.25%) bupivacaine or a 20-mL bolus followed by a 20-mL/h infusion of dilute (0.0625%) bupivacaine. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia of the study solution was then used to assess additional analgesia requirements. Analgesic requirement, maternal satisfaction and obstetric outcome were compared. Results: For subjects receiving 0.25% bupivacaine, the median total dose of drug administered was greater (117 vs. 90 mg, P = 0.0008), and the mean maternal satisfaction score was less (82 vs. 93, P = 0.04) than with the 0.0625% solution. Conclusions: Larger volumes of more dilute solutions may result in dose sparing and provide more effective labor analgesia. This study supports the continued trend towards dilute local anesthetic mixtures for labor epidural analgesia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.0625% ropivacaine versus bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor
    Smiley, RM
    Kim-Lo, SH
    Goodman, SR
    Jackson, MA
    Landau, R
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U213 - U213
  • [2] A randomized trial of patient-controlled epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia during labor
    Sharma, SK
    Leveno, KJ
    Messick, G
    Alexander, JM
    Sidawi, JE
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, : U8 - U8
  • [3] Obstetric outcomes and maternal satisfaction in nulliparous women using patient-controlled epidural analgesia
    Haydon, Michael L.
    Larson, David
    Reed, Enrique
    Shrivastava, Vineet K.
    Preslicka, Christine W.
    Nageotte, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (03)
  • [4] Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
    Sugur, Tayfun
    Kizilates, Esra
    Kizilates, Ali
    Inanoglu, Kerem
    Karsli, Bilge
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01): : 8 - 18
  • [5] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Regimens for Labor
    Lim, Yvonne
    Ocampo, Cecilia E.
    Supandji, Mia
    Teoh, Wendy H. L.
    Sia, Alex T.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (06): : 1968 - 1972
  • [6] Patient-controlled Analgesia with Epidural Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Combination for Labor Analgesia
    Jayalakshmi, B. K.
    Dharmalingam, A. L.
    Sathyamoorthy, Valli
    Sivakumar, R. K.
    Rajsekar, R.
    Anandan, Heber
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (06) : 148 - 152
  • [7] Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labor; a randomized controlled equivalence trial
    Freeman, Liv
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    Franssen, Maureen
    Papatsonis, Dimitri
    Hollmann, Markus
    Woiski, Mallory
    Porath, Martina
    van den Berg, Hans
    van Beek, Erik
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    Sikkema, Marko
    Logtenberg, Sabine
    Oudijk, Martijn
    Bax, Caroline
    van der Salm, Paulien
    van den Akker-van Marle, Elske
    le Cessie, Saskia
    van Lith, Jan
    Struys, Michel
    Dahan, Albert
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Middeldorp, Johanna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S36 - S37
  • [8] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction
    Nikkola, E
    Läärä, A
    Hinkka, S
    Ekblad, U
    Kero, P
    Salonen, M
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [9] Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
    Smiley, Richard M.
    Stephenson, Leroi
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2007, 45 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [10] Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
    Halpern, Stephen H.
    Carvalho, Brendan
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (03): : 921 - 928