WHY ARE THERE SO FEW CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERTARIANS IN LEGAL ACADEMIA? AN EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION OF THREE HYPOTHESES

被引：0

|

作者：

Phillips, James C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Jurisprudence & Social Policy, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

来源：

HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY | 2016年 / 39卷 / 01期

关键词：

INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY; PROPENSITY SCORE; CAUSAL INFERENCE; LAW-SCHOOL; CRITERIA; BIAS;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：153 / 207

页数：55

相关论文

共 7 条

[1] Why so Few Conservatives and Should we Care?
Philip E. Tetlock
Gregory Mitchell
[J]. Society, 2015, 52 : 28 - 34
[2] Why so Few Conservatives and Should we Care?
Tetlock, Philip E.
Mitchell, Gregory
[J]. SOCIETY, 2015, 52 (01) : 28 - 34
[3] Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia
Fox Tree, Jean E.
Vaid, Jyotsna
[J]. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 6
[4] Why so Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies in 1998–2010
Nina Smith
Pierpaolo Parrotta
[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 147 : 445 - 467
[5] THE GLASS CEILING IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION - WHY DO LAW FIRMS STILL HAVE SO FEW FEMALE PARTNERS
FOSTER, SE
[J]. UCLA LAW REVIEW, 1995, 42 (06) : 1631 - 1689
[6] Why so Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies in 1998-2010
Smith, Nina
Parrotta, Pierpaolo
[J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 147 (02) : 445 - 467
[7] WHY ARE SO FEW FEMALES PROMOTED INTO CEO AND VICE PRESIDENT POSITIONS? DANISH EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, 1997-2007
Smith, Nina
Smith, Valdemar
Verner, Mette
[J]. ILR REVIEW, 2013, 66 (02) : 380 - 408