Confidence gap or timid trust building? The role of trust in the evolution of the nuclear waste governance in Germany

被引:3
|
作者
Di Nucci, Maria Rosaria [1 ]
Losada, Ana Maria Isidoro [1 ]
Themann, Doerte [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Environm Policy Res Ctr, Ihnestr 22, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Trust and distrust; institutions; participation; siting process; nuclear waste; PERCEIVED RISK; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2021.1936605
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Nuclear waste disposal represents one of the biggest socio-economic challenges of this century and probably for many centuries to come. It is a highly complex issue due to the interrelated technical, material, social, economic and political dimensions as well as the real or perceived risks involved. Distrust in technology, institutions, industry and even experts and decision-making processes are some of the reasons for opposition to nuclear waste disposal strategies. Our contribution analyses the dynamics of trust and distrust in Germany over the evolution of the search for a nuclear waste repository site in the last 40 years, identifies major turning points and explores the main factors that shaped trust/distrust relations over time. Site selection conflicts have often provoked 'confidence gaps' and site selection policies depend heavily on relationships based on mutual recognition and trust. We select key factors considered necessary to build trust in institutions and siting selection procedures and review recent changes in the institutional setting, including the establishment of a National Civil Society Board and the attempt to design more participatory procedures. Twenty-one stakeholders and experts were asked to rate some of the identified factors necessary for building trust and whether the measures carried out so far are sufficient to enhance trust in the relevant institutions and procedures and increase public confidence. Without a trust-building process for the siting, development and operation of a risky asset, a short-term attenuation of long-lasting conflicts is unlikely. The legacy of the past still plays an inhibiting role. In addition to expert judgement, evidence was derived from document analysis and participatory observation in the works of the German 'Commission on the Storage of High-level Radioactive Waste' and of the 'National Civil Society Board' as well as of events of regulator and operator.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 612
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Building public trust and confidence
    Sobel, AD
    [J]. JUDICATURE, 2005, 89 (02) : 57 - +
  • [2] The Role of Banking Governance in Consumer Trust and Confidence: A Shared Responsibility
    Ansell, Jake
    [J]. CELEBRATING AMERICA'S PASTIMES: BASEBALL, HOT DOGS, APPLE PIE AND MARKETING?, 2016, : 127 - 128
  • [4] CONFIDENCE AND TRUST IN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
    BERKE, C
    [J]. ATOMWIRTSCHAFT-ATOMTECHNIK, 1986, 31 (05): : 227 - 227
  • [5] Building Confidence in a World of Eroding Trust
    Lim, Jonathan W. Z.
    Thing, Vrizlynn L. L.
    [J]. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2024, 5 (02):
  • [6] The role of face in a Chinese context of trust and trust building
    King, Peter C.
    Wei, Zhang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18 (02) : 149 - 173
  • [7] Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
    De Filippi, Primavera
    Mannan, Morshed
    Reijers, Wessel
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 62
  • [8] Relational Signalling in Governance Mechanisms and Trust Building
    Diong, Kah Seng
    Foong, Soon Yau
    Sambasivan, Mural
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 9 : 49 - 61
  • [9] The Role of Interruption in Building Trust
    Haroutunian-Gordon, Sophie
    Meadows, Elizabeth
    [J]. SCHOOLS-STUDIES IN EDUCATION, 2009, 6 (01) : 37 - 56
  • [10] Technocracy and trust: Nuclear waste controversy
    Bella, D.A.
    Mosher, C.D.
    Calvo, S.N.
    [J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 1988, 114 (01): : 27 - 39