Efficacy of aripiprazole augmentation in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: A subgroup analysis and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression item analyses of the Aripiprazole Depression Multicenter Efficacy study

被引:23
|
作者
Ozaki, Norio [1 ]
Otsubo, Tempei [2 ]
Kato, Masaki [5 ]
Higuchi, Teruhiko [3 ]
Ono, Hiroaki [4 ]
Kamijima, Kunitoshi [6 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Psychiat, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi 4668550, Japan
[2] Tokyo Shinjuku Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Psychosomat Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Otsuka Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Neuropsychiat, Osaka, Japan
[6] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Otawara, Japan
关键词
aripiprazole; augmentation therapy; Japanese; major depressive disorder; subgroup analysis; TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADJUNCTIVE THERAPY; INADEQUATE-RESPONSE; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; RECEPTORS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/pcn.12214
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
AimResults from this randomized, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole augmentation to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (the Aripiprazole Depression Multicenter Efficacy [ADMIRE] study) revealed that aripiprazole augmentation was superior to ADT alone and was well tolerated. In subgroup analyses, we investigated the influence of demographic- and disease-related factors on the observed responses. We also examined how individual symptom improvement was related to overall improvement in MDD. MethodsData from the ADMIRE study were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed on the primary outcome measures: the mean change in the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from the end of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) treatment to the end of the randomized treatment. ResultsChanges in the MADRS total scores were consistently greater with aripiprazole than placebo in each of the subgroups. Efficacy was not related to sex, age, number of adequate ADT trials in the current episode, MDD diagnosis, number of depressive episodes, duration of the current episode, age at first depressive episode, time since the first depressive episode, type of SSRI/SNRI, or severity at the end of SSRI/SNRI treatment phase. Compared to placebo, aripiprazole resulted in significant and rapid improvement on seven of the 10 MADRS items, including sadness. ConclusionThese post-hoc analyses indicated that aripiprazole was effective for a variety of Japanese patients with MDD who had exhibited inadequate responses to ADT. Additionally, we suggest that aripiprazole significantly and rapidly improved the core depressive symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of the 'Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression' and the 'Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale'
    Huijbrechts, IPAM
    Haffmans, PMJ
    Jonker, K
    van Dijke, A
    Hoencamp, E
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 1999, 11 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [2] Comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: Baked Straight From a Randomized Study
    Santi, N. Simple
    Biswal, Sashi B.
    Naik, Birendra Narayan
    Sahoo, Jyoti Prakash
    Rath, Bhabagrahi
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [3] Relationship between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed elderly: A meta-analysis
    Heo, Moonseong
    Murphy, Christopher F.
    Meyers, Barnett S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 15 (10): : 899 - 905
  • [4] Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (06) : 577 - 582
  • [5] Moderate and severe depression gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Müller, MJ
    Szegedi, A
    Wetzel, H
    Benkert, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 60 (02) : 137 - 140
  • [6] Defining remission on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [7] Hamilton depression rating scale and montgomery-asberg depression rating scale in depressed and bipolar I patients: psychometric properties in a Brazilian sample
    Carneiro, Adriana Munhoz
    Fernandes, Fernando
    Moreno, Ricardo Alberto
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [8] Items of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Associated With Response to Paroxetine Treatment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
    Tomita, Tetsu
    Sato, Yasushi
    Nakagami, Taku
    Tsuchimine, Shoko
    Kaneda, Ayako
    Kaneko, Sunao
    Nakamura, Kazuhiko
    Yasui-Furukori, Norio
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 39 (03) : 135 - 139
  • [9] Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression rating scale and the Clinical Global Impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials
    Khan, A
    Khan, SR
    Shankles, EB
    Polissar, NL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 17 (06) : 281 - 285
  • [10] Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale, the Hamilton depression rating scale and the Clinical Global Impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials: a replication analysis
    Khan, A
    Brodhead, AE
    Kolts, RL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 19 (03) : 157 - 160