Combined use of short-term and long-term cardiovascular risk scores in primary prevention: an assessment of clinical utility

被引:3
|
作者
Veronesi, Giovanni [1 ]
Giampaoli, Simona [2 ]
Vanuzzo, Diego [3 ]
Gianfagna, Francesco [1 ,4 ]
Palmieri, Luigi [2 ]
Grassi, Guido [5 ,6 ]
Cesana, Giancarlo [7 ]
Ferrario, Marco M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dipartimento Med & Chirurg, Ctr Ric Epidemiol & Med Prevent, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] Ist Super Sanita, Dipartimento Malattie Cardiovasc Dismetab & Invec, Rome, Italy
[3] ANMCO, Florence, Italy
[4] IRCCS Ist Neurol Mediterraneo Neuromed, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent, Pozzilli, Italy
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Med & Chirurg, Clin Med, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS Multimed, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milano Bicocca, Ctr Ric Sanita Pubbl, Monza, Italy
关键词
CAMUNI-MATISS; cardiovascular disease; clinical utility; Italy; risk stratification; PREDICTION MODELS; HEART-DISEASE; TIME TRENDS; POPULATION; MORTALITY; EVENTS; COHORT; RATES;
D O I
10.2459/JCM.0000000000000509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To evaluate the clinical utility of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification based on a combined use of short-term and long-term risk scores in the primary prevention setting. Methods CVD-free participants 40-65 years old initially to seven population-based cohorts enrolled in northern and central Italy were stratified as 'low' (ESC-SCORE <= 1%), 'intermediate' (SCORE 1-4%) and 'moderate/high' short-term CVD risk (SCORE >= 4% or diabetes). The long-term CVD risk was estimated using the CAMUNI-MATISS model, validated for the Italian population. Participants were followed up for a median time of 16 years to ascertain the first major CVD event, fatal or nonfatal. To compare the 'combined' (SCORERCAMUNI-MATISS) with the 'current' (SCORE alone) stratification, we estimated the difference in Net Benefit between the two strategies. Results Study sample included 3935 men (468 CVD events) and 4393 women (210 events). Under the 'current' stratification, 76% of men and 21% of women were at 'intermediate' risk and eligible to treatment. Only 40% of them had elevated predicted long-term risk and could have received indication to treatment under the 'combined' strategy. The latter would have saved 3 and 3.5 unnecessary treatments per every CVD case in men and women, respectively, and the Net Benefit significantly increased [men: 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-5.6; women: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.7-6.9]. Similarly, among the 74% of women not receiving indication for prevention because at 'low'short-term risk, the 'combined' stratification significantly increased the Net Benefit (1.4, 95% CI: 0.6-2.1) and reduced from 40 to 10% the proportion of events occurring among women not eligible to any preventive action. Conclusion In the Italian population, a combination of validated short-term and long-term CVD risk scores has the potential to select for prevention women whose risk is currently not fully addressed and to reduce unnecessary costly treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining short- and long-term risk scores in primary prevention of major cardiovascular disease events: an assessment of clinical utility
    Veronesi, G.
    Giampaoli, S.
    Gianfagna, F.
    Palmieri, L.
    Vanuzzo, D.
    Grassi, G.
    Cesana, G.
    Ferrario, M. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1337 - 1338
  • [2] COMBINING SHORT- AND LONG-TERM RISK SCORES IN PRIMARY PREVENTION OF MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE EVENTS IN LOW INCIDENCE POPULATIONS: AN ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL UTILITY
    Veronesi, Giovanni
    Giampaoli, Simona
    Gianfagna, Francesco
    Palmieri, Luigi
    Vanuzzo, Diego
    Grassi, Guido
    Cesana, Giancarlo
    Ferrario, Marco M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E63 - E64
  • [3] Cardiovascular risk assessment in women: prediction of short-term and long-term risk; the Rotterdam study
    Kavousi, M.
    Leening, M.
    Ikram, A.
    Heeringa, J.
    Koudstaal, P.
    Hofman, A.
    Steyerberg, E.
    Franco, O.
    Witteman, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 302 - 302
  • [4] Comparison of short-term and long-term variability in nasalance scores
    Lewis, Kerry E.
    Watterson, Thomas
    Blanton, Ann
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2008, 45 (05): : 495 - 500
  • [5] Particulate Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Risk: Short-term and Long-term Effects
    Franchini, Massimo
    Mannucci, Pier Mannuccio
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2009, 35 (07): : 665 - 670
  • [6] Short-term and long-term cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome and HIV in Tanzania
    Kingery, Justin R.
    Alfred, Yona
    Smart, Luke R.
    Nash, Emily
    Todd, Jim
    Naguib, Mostafa R.
    Downs, Jennifer A.
    Kalluvya, Samuel
    Kataraihya, Johannes B.
    Peck, Robert N.
    HEART, 2016, 102 (15) : 1200 - 1205
  • [7] The perception of homeownership utility: Short-term and long-term effects
    Stotz, Olaf
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2019, 44 : 99 - 111
  • [8] The short-term and the long-term effect of primary schools and classes on mathematics and language achievement scores
    Pustjens, Heidi
    Van de gaer, Eva
    Van Damme, Jan
    Onghena, Patrick
    Van Landeghem, Georges
    BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 33 (03) : 419 - 440
  • [10] Short-term and long-term implications of an obstetric risk
    Dulude, D
    Belanger, C
    Wright, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 84180 - 84180