Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis

被引:77
|
作者
Khan, Rishad [1 ]
Plahouras, Joanne [2 ]
Johnston, Bradley C. [3 ]
Scaffidi, Michael A. [4 ,5 ]
Grover, Samir C. [4 ,5 ]
Walsh, Catharine M. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Nutr & Res & Learning Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY SIMULATION; SKILLS; COMPETENCE; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; FIDELITY; FEEDBACK; FELLOWS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1055/a-0894-4400
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopy programs are increasingly integrating simulation training. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether virtual reality (VR) simulation training can supplement and/or replace conventional patient-based endoscopy training for health professional trainees with limited or no prior endoscopic experience. Methods We searched medical, educational, and computer literature databases in July 2017 for trials that compared VR simulation training with no training, conventional training, another form of simulation training. Or an alternative method of VR training. We screened, abstracted data, and performed quantitative analysis and quality assessment through Cochrane methodology. Results We included 18 trials with 3817 endoscopic procedures. VR training provided no advantage over no training or conventional training based on the primary outcome of composite score of competency. VR training was advantageous over no training based on independent procedure completion (relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.26, moderate-quality evidence), overall rating of performance (mean difference [MD] 0.45, 95%CI 0.15-0.75, very low-quality evidence), and mucosal visualization (MD 0.60, 95%CI 0.20-1.00, very low-quality evidence). Compared with conventional training, VR training resulted in fewer independent procedure completions (RR =0.45, 95 %CI 0.27-0.74, low-quality evidence). We found no differences between VR training and no training or conventional training for other outcomes. Based on qualitative analysis, we found no significant differences between VR training and other forms of simulation training. VR curricula based in educational theory provided benefit with respect to composite score of competency, compared with unstructured curricula. Conclusions VR simulation training is advantageous Over no training and can supplement conventional endoscopy training. There is insufficient evidence that simulation training provides benefit over conventional training.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 664
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATION TRAINING IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Plahouras, Joanne
    Khan, Rishad
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Scaffidi, Michael A.
    Grover, Samir C.
    Walsh, Catharine M.
    [J]. GUT, 2018, 67 : A275 - A276
  • [2] VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATION TRAINING IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Khan, Rishad
    Plahouras, Joanne
    Johnston, Bradley
    Scaffidi, Michael A.
    Grover, Samir C.
    Walsh, Catharine M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB614 - AB614
  • [3] SIMULATION IN ENDOSCOPY TRAINING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Smith, Rebecca
    Zhao, Melissa
    [J]. GUT, 2021, 70 : A78 - A79
  • [4] VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATION IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY TRAINING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Sheikh, Z.
    Jackson, R.
    Tharmanathan, P.
    Keding, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 31 - 31
  • [5] Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Alaker, Medhat
    Wynn, Greg R.
    Arulampalam, Tan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 29 : 85 - 94
  • [6] Virtual reality for safety training: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Scorgie, D.
    Feng, Z.
    Paes, D.
    Parisi, F.
    Yiu, T. W.
    Lovreglio, R.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 171
  • [7] A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs
    Howard, Matt C.
    Gutworth, Melissa B.
    Jacobs, Rick R.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 121
  • [8] Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training
    Harpham-Lockyer, Louis
    Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios
    Berlingieri, Pasquale
    Epstein, Owen
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 7 (18): : 1287 - 1294
  • [9] Virtual Reality in Decision-Making Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bi, Xinyu
    Hu, Yongbin
    Yang, Xianmin
    Zhang, Jinying
    Li, Xiaoyi
    Tao, Pengrui
    Chen, Meitan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024,
  • [10] Virtual reality training enhances gait poststroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghai, Shashank
    Ghai, Ishan
    Lamontagne, Anouk
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2020, 1478 (01) : 18 - 42