Chicago Classification update (V4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility

被引:24
|
作者
Gyawali, C. Prakash [1 ]
Zerbib, Frank [2 ]
Bhatia, Shobna [3 ]
Cisternas, Daniel [4 ]
Coss-Adame, Enrique [5 ,6 ]
Lazarescu, Adriana [7 ]
Pohl, Daniel [8 ]
Yadlapati, Rena [9 ]
Penagini, Roberto [10 ]
Pandolfino, John [11 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, 60 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8124, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Dept Gastroenterol, Ctr Medicochirurg Magellan, Hop Haut Leveque,CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
[3] Sir HN Reliance Fdn Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] Univ Desarrollo, Clin Alemana Santiago, Fac Med, Santiago, Chile
[5] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Gastroenterol, Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
[6] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Lab Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
[7] Univ Alberta, Div Gastroenterol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Hosp Zurich, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Esophageal Dis, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[10] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[11] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY | 2021年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
absent contractility; high‐ resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility;
D O I
10.1111/nmo.14134
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Esophageal hypomotility disorders manifest with abnormal esophageal body contraction vigor, breaks in peristaltic integrity, or failure of peristalsis in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 recognizes two hypomotility disorders, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and absent contractility, while fragmented peristalsis has been incorporated into the IEM definition. Updated criteria for ineffective swallows consist of weak esophageal body contraction vigor measured using distal contractile integral (DCI, 100-450 mmHg center dot cm center dot s), transition zone defects >5 cm measured using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour, or failure of peristalsis (DCI < 100 mmHg center dot cm center dot s). More than 70% ineffective swallows and/or >= 50% failed swallows are required for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. When the diagnosis is inconclusive (50%-70% ineffective swallows), supplementary evidence from multiple rapid swallows (absence of contraction reserve), barium radiography (abnormal bolus clearance), or HRM with impedance (abnormal bolus clearance) could support a diagnosis of IEM. Absent contractility requires 100% failed peristalsis, consistent with previous versions of the classification. Consideration needs to be given for the possibility of achalasia in absent contractility with dysphagia despite normal IRP, and alternate complementary tests (including timed upright barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe) are recommended to confirm or refute the presence of achalasia. Future research to quantify esophageal bolus retention on stationary HRM with impedance and to understand contraction vigor thresholds that predict bolus clearance will provide further refinement to diagnostic criteria for esophageal hypomotility disorders in future iterations of the Chicago Classification.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Chicago Classification Update (v4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for distal esophageal spasm
    Roman, Sabine
    Hebbard, Geoff
    Jung, Kee Wook
    Katz, Phil
    Tutuian, Radu
    Wong, Reuben
    Wu, Justin
    Yadlapati, Rena
    Sifrim, Daniel
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (05):
  • [2] Chicago Classification Update (v4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for hypercontractile esophagus
    Chen, Joan W.
    Savarino, Edoardo
    Smout, Andre
    Xiao, Yinglian
    de Bortoli, Nicola
    Yadlapati, Rena
    Cock, Charles
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (06):
  • [3] Unlocking the Enigma: Exploring the Clinical Impact of Chicago Classification V4.0 Criteria on Ineffective Esophageal Motility
    Parameshwari, Subanandhini Subramaniam
    Lambert, Karissa
    Anciano, Carlos
    Khalaf, Mohamed
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S438 - S439
  • [4] Clinical and demographic variables among patients with ineffective esophageal motility using Chicago classification v4.0
    Tuan, A. W.
    Syed, N.
    Panganiban, R.
    Lee, R. Y.
    Dalessio, S.
    Pradhan, S.
    Zhu, J.
    Ouyang, A.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33
  • [5] Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0
    Mueller, Michaela
    Denzer, Ulrike W.
    Kreuser, Nicole
    Thieme, Rene
    Hoffmeister, Albrecht
    Feisthammel, Juergen
    Niebisch, Stefan
    Gockel, Ines
    [J]. LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2023, 102 (10) : 742 - 753
  • [6] Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia
    Khan, Abraham
    Yadlapati, Rena
    Gonlachanvit, Sutep
    Katzka, David A.
    Park, Moo In
    Vaezi, Michael
    Vela, Marcelo
    Pandolfino, John
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (07):
  • [7] Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0
    Mueller, Michaela
    Denzer, Ulrike W.
    Kreuser, Nicole
    Thieme, Rene
    Hoffmeister, Albrecht
    Feisthammel, Juergen
    Niebisch, Stefan
    Gockel, Ines
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2023, 61 (03): : 284 - 296
  • [8] Esophageal motility disorder - has Chicago classification v4.0 simplified our management?
    Edeani, Francis
    Massey, Benson
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 31 (06): : 374 - 381
  • [9] Comparison of patients diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility according to the Chicago classification v3.0 and v4.0 definitions, 2011-2019
    Tuan, A. W.
    Syed, N.
    Panganiban, R.
    Lee, R. Y.
    Dalessio, S.
    Pradhan, S.
    Zhu, J.
    Ouyang, A.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33
  • [10] Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM) on Chicago Classification v4.0 Have Weaker Swallows and Worse Bolus Clearance Than Patients Meeting Only v3.0 Criteria
    Chon, Christy
    El Halabi, Maan
    Smith, Michael S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S162 - S162