Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:16
|
作者
Park, Dae Yong [1 ]
An, Seokyung [2 ]
Jolly, Neeraj [3 ]
Attanasio, Steve [3 ]
Yadav, Neha [4 ,5 ]
Rao, Sunil [6 ,7 ]
Vij, Aviral [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Cook Cty Hlth, Div Cardiol, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Rush Med Coll, Div Cardiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[6] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Durham, NC USA
来源
关键词
bifurcation technique; coronary; DK crush; percutaneous coronary intervention; provisional; stent; two-stent; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; ELUTING STENTS; LEFT MAIN; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; KISSING BALLOON; CRUSH TECHNIQUE; DK CRUSH; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.122.025394
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Bifurcation lesions account for 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions and represent a complex subset which are associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of restenosis. The ideal bifurcation technique, however, remains elusive. Methods and Results Extensive search of the literature was performed to pull data from randomized clinical trials that met predetermined inclusion criteria. Conventional meta-analysis produced pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of 2-stent technique versus provisional stent on prespecified outcomes. Both frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare bifurcation techniques. A total of 8318 patients were included from 29 randomized clinical trials. Conventional meta-analysis showed no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization between 2-stent techniques and provisional stenting. Frequentist network meta-analysis revealed that double kissing crush was associated with lower cardiac death (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.84), major adverse cardiac events (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39-0.64), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.90), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88), target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization when compared with provisional stenting. Double kissing crush was also superior to other 2-stent techniques, including T-stent or T and protrusion, dedicated bifurcation stent, and culotte. Conclusions Double kissing crush was associated with lower risk of cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization compared with provisional stenting and was superior to other 2-stent techniques. Superiority of 2-stent strategy over provisional stenting was observed in subgroup meta-analysis stratified to side branch lesion length >= 10 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:68
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes With Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Shnoda, Mina
    Dang, Alexander
    Gad, Mohamed
    Abdelazeem, Mohamed
    Saad, Marwan
    Salama, Amr
    Sharma, Alok
    Gilani, Syed
    Latib, Azeem
    Rab, Tanveer
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 165 : 37 - 45
  • [2] Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques for Bifurcation Disease: Network Meta -analysis Reveals Superiority of Double -Kissing Crush
    Crimi, Gabriele
    Mandurino-Mirizzi, Alessandro
    Gritti, Valeria
    Scotti, Valeria
    Strozzi, Clara
    de Silvestri, Annalisa
    Montalto, Claudio
    di Giacomo, Ciro
    d'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    Repetto, Alessandra
    Ferlini, Marco
    Marinoni, Barbara
    Ferrario, Maurizio
    de Servi, Stefano
    Visconti, Luigi Oltrona
    Klersy, Catherine
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (06) : 906 - 914
  • [3] Assessment of Coronary Stenoses for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    d'Entremont, Marc-Andre
    Tiong, Denise
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    McGrath, Brian P.
    Cioffi, Giacomo Maria
    Al Garni, Turki
    Cheema, Zain M.
    Layland, Jamie
    Revaiah, Pruthvi C.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 223 : 29 - 39
  • [4] Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Rong-Rong
    Lv, Yong-Hui
    Guo, Chen
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Ming-Bo
    Wang, Zhi-Lu
    Meng, Ying
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (37) : E20798
  • [5] Atorvastatin before percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garcia-Campa, Mariano
    Flores-Ramirez, Ramiro
    Rojo-Garza, Sabrina
    Carrizales-Sepulveda, Edgar Francisco
    Regalado-Ceballos, Diego
    Reyes-Araiza, Raul
    alvarez-Villalobos, Neri
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Azpiri-Lopez, Jose Ramon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [6] Percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified stenoses: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis
    Kristensen, Andreas Torp
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    Olsen, Niels Thue
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [7] Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van den Eynde, Jef
    Sa, Michel Pompeu
    De Groote, Senne
    Amabile, Andrea
    Sicouri, Serge
    Ramlawi, Basel
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Oosterlinck, Wouter
    [J]. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2021, 37
  • [8] Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shimony, Avi
    Joseph, Lawrence
    Mottillo, Salvatore
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (06) : 843 - 850
  • [9] ANTIPLATELET DURATION STRATEGIES AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WITH STENTING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Knijnik, Leonardo Mees
    Fernandes, Marcelo
    Maza, Manuel Rivera
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Cardoso, Rhanderson
    Goyal, Abhinav
    McDaniel, Michael C.
    Liberman, Henry
    Sperling, Laurence S.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 69 - 69
  • [10] Microaxial Circulatory Support for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leon, S. A.
    Austin, M. A.
    Rosen, J. L.
    Ahmad, D.
    Vishnevsky, A.
    Rajapreyar, I. N.
    Ruggiero, N. J.
    Rame, J. E.
    Entwistle, J. W.
    Massey, H. T.
    Tchantchaleishvili, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S470 - S470