Operating room communication in robotic surgery: Place, modalities and evolution of a safe system of interaction

被引:19
|
作者
Almeras, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Clin Croix Sud, Dept Urol, 52 Chemin Ribaute, F-31130 Quint Fonsegrives, France
[2] Clin Croix Sud, IBODE, F-31130 Quint Fonsegrives, France
关键词
Communication; Surgery; Robot; Robotic safety; DISTRACTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.02.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate by questionnaire the feelings and the expectations of the different members of the operating room (OR) team in terms of communication during a robotic surgery with remote operator immersion. Materials and methods: A total of 130 questionnaires were sent to several surgical units equipped for robotic surgery and addressed to operators (0), operative assistants (OA) and scrub nurses (SN). It included 32 questions addressing the following themes: function, experience, previous training, impressions about communication (difficulties, the place of verbal interactions, evolution with experience and role of each team member in communication). Results: Only 17.4% of responses reported the use of communication protocols. The need for systematic description by the OA/SN of the difficulties in performing an action outside the operator's visual field was perceived as "essential" by 59%, 44.4% and 73.7%, "useful" by 35.9%, 55.6% and 21.1% of the SN, OA and O, respectively. Impaired communication was experienced during the learning phase by 60%, 80% and 57.9% of the SN, OA and O, respectively. During the apprenticeship phase, > 92% of the OR team members felt that a systematic mode of verbal control was particularly useful. With the acquisition of experience, 82.1%, 80% and 73.7% of the SN, OA and O, respectively, thought it was necessary to continue a systematic mode of communication. Conclusion: With immersion, the surgeon unconsciously loses non-verbal exchange and becomes cut off from his surgical environment. The assistant is the one who perceives feelings of isolation most acutely. Therefore, interaction and communication must be verbal, systematic and safe. Systematic verbal communication should be reinforced during the training phase and continued thereafter although it could become more relaxed as experience increases. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery
    Samy Cheikh Youssef
    Kaled Haram
    Jonathan Noël
    Vipul Patel
    James Porter
    Prokar Dasgupta
    Nadine Hachach-Haram
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [2] Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery
    Cheikh Youssef, Samy
    Haram, Kaled
    Noel, Jonathan
    Patel, Vipul
    Porter, James
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Hachach-Haram, Nadine
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [3] Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room
    Sutkin, Gary
    Steele, Carsen
    Brommelsiek, Margaret
    Simonson, Richard John
    Chan, Yui-Yee Raymond
    Davies, Amber
    Catchpole, Ken
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [4] OPTIMIZING OPERATING ROOM EFFICIENCY IN ROBOTIC SURGERY
    Harmanli, O.
    Jones, K.
    Solak, S.
    Bayram, A.
    Yuksel, B.
    Al-Jehani, F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 25 : S54 - S55
  • [5] Miscommunication in the Robotic Operating Room: Speech Communication Interference
    Sutkin, Gary
    Steele, Carsen
    Brommelsiek, Margaret
    Simonson, Richard J.
    Chan, Yui-Yee R.
    Davies, Amber
    Catchpole, Ken
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S247 - S247
  • [6] SAFE SURGERY IN A SAFE OPERATING ROOM MODEL: A META-SYNTHESIS
    Ghafouri, Raziyeh
    Saeedi, Maryam
    Malmir, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (03): : 684 - 690
  • [7] Robotic colorectal surgery: evolution of its place
    Pillinger, Stephen H.
    Lynch, Craig
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (1-2) : 6 - 7
  • [8] REDUCING OPERATING ROOM TURNOVER TIME FOR ROBOTIC PELVIC SURGERY
    Perkins, Colby E.
    Catchpole, Ken
    Wood, Lauren N.
    Solnik, M. Jonathon
    Avenido, Raymund M.
    Strauss, Paul L.
    Eilber, Karyn S.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2015, 34 : S83 - S84
  • [9] Robotic and computer-aided surgery in the operating room of 2010
    Davies, BL
    INDUSTRIAL ROBOT, 2001, 28 (05): : 364 - 365
  • [10] Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room
    Mokhtari, Leila
    Hosseinzadeh, Fatemeh
    Nourazarian, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)