Patient Versus Physician Variation in Use of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:2
|
作者
Shamim, Shariq [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Fengming [1 ]
Safley, David [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Philip [1 ,2 ]
Spertus, John A. [1 ,2 ]
Baklanov, Dmitri [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO 64111 USA
[2] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2017年 / 119卷 / 12期
关键词
REGISTRY; ACCESS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The prevalence of radial access for transradial catheterization remains low in the United States, occurring in only 28% of cases in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI. It is unknown whether the low adoption rate has been influenced by patient characteristics or is more operator dependent. In a 10-center study, we compared clinical and demographic characteristics among 323 radial and 1,506 femoral access percutaneous coronary intervention (PCIs) performed by 65 interventionists capable of radial PCI. We created a hierarchical logistic regression model to identify operator and patient characteristics associated with radial PCI and the median rate ratio to quantify the variation across operators. A subset was interviewed to assess health literacy and preferences in shared medical decision making. Radial access was used in 17.7% of patients. Patient factors associated with lower rate of radial PCI were previous PCI (33.4% vs 41.4%, p = 0.008), history of coronary artery bypass graft (8.4% vs 23.0%, p<0.001), and chronic total occlusion PCI (10.2% vs 17.9%, p<0.001). Operator characteristics associated with lower rate of radial PCI are being older, being longer in practice, lower number of publications, and Southern practice location. The range of radial use across operators was 1% to 99% and the median rate ratio was 1.97. Patients with radial access had lower health literacy, as assessed by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine Revised (REALM) score (6.6 +/- 2.6 vs 7.1 +/- 2.0, p = 0.03) but did not differ in their preferences for shared decision making. In conclusion, our study demonstrates a high degree of variability of radial access for PCI among different operators, with few differences in patient characteristics, suggesting that improvement efforts should focus on operators. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1941
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transradial versus transfemoral vascular access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kovacevic, M.
    Petrovic, M.
    Jandric, V. Blagojevic
    Vulin, A.
    Ivanov, I.
    Cankovic, M.
    Ivanovic, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2017, 16 : S37 - S37
  • [2] Anticoagulation in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Appleton, Darryn L.
    Cooke, Richard H.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Jovin, Ion S.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [3] Costs of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Amin, Amit P.
    House, John A.
    Safley, David M.
    Chhatriwalla, Adnan K.
    Giersiefen, Helmut
    Bremer, Andreas
    Hamon, Martial
    Baklanov, Dmitri V.
    Aluko, Akinyele
    Wohns, David
    Mathias, David W.
    Applegate, Robert A.
    Cohen, David J.
    Marso, Steven P.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (08) : 827 - 834
  • [4] Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
    Duan, Kevin I.
    Helfrich, Christian D.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Neely, Emily L.
    Sulc, Christine A.
    Naranjo, Diana
    Wong, Edwin S.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [5] Transulnar versus transradial access as a default strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ranwa, Bhanwar L.
    Priti, Kumari
    HEART VIEWS, 2019, 20 (04): : 152 - 157
  • [6] Successful Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus
    Sinha, Ramanand P.
    Agarwal, Deepesh
    Sarang, Arohi Mehul
    Thakkar, Ashok Suryakant
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (01) : OD04 - OD5
  • [7] Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Patient Risk A New Radial Paradox?
    Watson, Ryan A.
    Kochar, Ajar
    Shah, Pinak B.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (07)
  • [8] Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Schussler, Jeffrey M.
    Vasudevan, Anupama
    von Bose, Liana J.
    Won, Jane I.
    McCullough, Peter A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (04): : 482 - 488
  • [9] Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with a Rare Coronary Anomaly: Twin Circumflex Arteries
    Otlu, Yilmaz Omur
    Bayramoglu, Adil
    Hidayet, Siho
    Ermis, Necip
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 31 (01) : 72 - 74
  • [10] Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention reply
    Vink, Maarten A.
    Amoroso, Giovanni
    Kiemeneij, Ferdinand
    HEART, 2012, 98 (14) : 1106 - 1107