Variability of Left Ventricular Electromechanical Activation during Right Ventricular Pacing: Implications for the Selection of the Optimal Pacing Site

Methods: Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed in 142 patients before and after RVA (54), RVS (44), and HA (44) pacing. Electromechanical activation was assessed by: (1) electromechanical latency (EML)-interval between QRS onset and mechanical activation of basal LV; (2) intra-LV dyssynchrony (intra-LV)-interval between earliest to the latest LV basal motion. The intra- and interpatients variability among pacing groups were assessed. Results: Pacing from RVA showed longer EML and higher degree of intra-LV than RVS and HA pacing. RVA and RVS showed a higher variability than HA pacing with regard to intrapatient changes of EML (RVA vs RVS, P = 0.4; RVS vs HA, P = 0.01, RVA vs HA, P = 0.0002) and intra-LV (RVA vs RVS, P = 0.2; RVS vs HA, P = 0.04; RVA vs HA, P = 0.005). Similar results were found in interpatients variability from paced-values. Conclusions: RVA and RVS pacing produce a variable effect on LV electromechanical activation that is significantly more pronounced than HA pacing. A pacing site such as HA selected by fluoroscopic and electrophysiological markers maintains baseline and homogeneous LV activation pattern. (PACE 2010; 566-574).