Primary care anticoagulant management using near patient testing

被引:2
|
作者
Daly, M
Murphy, AW [1 ]
O'Hanlon, C
Cosgrove, A
McKeown, D
Egan, E
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Galway, Dept Gen Practice, Galway, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Galway, Dept Hlth Promot, Galway, Ireland
[3] Merlin Pk Reg Hosp, Western Hlth Board, GP Unit, Galway, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Hosp Galway, Dept Haematol, Galway, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02914783
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Indications for anticoagulant treatment are increasing and new approaches to anticoagulant services require a shift from hospital to primary care. Aim To pragmatically test the validity and effectiveness of primary care anticoagulant management using near patient testing. Methods Twelve CoaguCheck monitors were supplied to 16 rural practices that had previously provided supervision of anticoagulant therapy. Practices were required to record data for eligible patients from September 1998 to April 1999 and to forward one blood sample per week to the regional hospital laboratory for parallel testing. Results Nine practices returned data on 122 patients. Indications for anticoagulation included atrial fibrillation (n=56), valve replacement (n=12) and deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (n=12). Regression of the mean of 185 paired readings against their difference confirmed the validity of the CoaguCheck monitor (r(2) = 0.00 [95% Cl -0.38 to 0.38]). There were 692 International Normalised Ratio (INR) tests performed representing an average of 5.7 tests per patient. The desired therapeutic range was provided for 609 (88%) of these tests; 294 (48.3%) were within the desired therapeutic range. Results differed significantly between practices. Conclusions This study confirmed the validity of anticoagulant management using the CoaguCheck monitor in primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 32
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary care anticoagulant management using near patient testing
    M Daly
    AW Murphy
    C O’Hanlon
    A Cosgrove
    D McKeown
    E Egan
    [J]. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2003, 172 : 30 - 32
  • [2] Anticoagulant management using near patient testing.
    Zetterberg, E
    Underwood, BM
    Margareta, H
    Per, L
    [J]. BLOOD, 2003, 102 (11) : 120B - 120B
  • [3] Decentralised anticoagulant care: Near patient sampling, dosing or testing?
    Baglin, TP
    Lefort, W
    Luddington, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 115 - 115
  • [4] Near-patient testing in primary care
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2010, 60 (572): : 157 - 158
  • [5] Near-patient testing in primary care
    Fitzmaurice, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2004, 54 (506): : 650 - 651
  • [6] Near-patient testing for allergy in Primary Care
    Cave, A. L.
    Smith, H. E.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2011, 41 (12): : 1838 - 1838
  • [7] The haematological primary/secondary care interface. A randomised controlled trial comparing primary care oral anticoagulant management utilising computerised decision support (DSS) and near patient testing (NPT), with traditional management
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Hobbs, FDR
    Rose, PE
    Murray, ET
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 31 - 31
  • [8] A randomised controlled trial comparing primary care oral anticoagulant management utilising computerised decision support (DSS) and near patient testing (NPT), with traditional management.
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Hobbs, FDR
    Rose, PE
    Murray, ET
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 114 - 114
  • [9] Near patient testing in primary care - Offers better patient management but needs proper evaluation and quality control
    Hobbs, R
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7026): : 263 - 264
  • [10] Primary care anticoagulant clinic management using computerized decision support and near patient International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing: routine data from a practice nurse-led clinic
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Hobbs, FDR
    Murray, ET
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (02) : 144 - 146