Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital

被引:171
|
作者
Walter, Jorge
Lechner, Christoph
Kellermanns, Franz W.
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Univ St Gallen, Inst Management, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Management & Informat Syst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
inter- and intrafirm networks; knowledge transfer; social capital; strategic alliances;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the process through which multilevel network structures translate into knowledge acquisition from alliance partners. The degree of knowledge transfer a multidivisional company achieves from its network of alliance partners is determined not only by the organization's external network structure, but also by the structure of relationships among its business units. By distinguishing two perspectives on the distribution of social capital's benefits - private versus collective - this article's approach reconciles the competing views on what types of network structures create social capital, that is, the brokerage and closure views of the social network literature. Private benefits of brokerage and centrality are more beneficial in interfirm networks, whereas collective benefits provided by network closure and low levels of centralization are more beneficial in intrafirm networks. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 710
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners
    Becerra, Manuel
    Lunnan, Randi
    Huemer, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (04) : 691 - 713
  • [2] Knowledge development, social capital and alliance learning
    Ratten, Vanessa
    Suseno, Yuliani
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (01) : 60 - +
  • [3] Inter-Firm Knowledge Transfer between Strategic Alliance Partners: A Way Forward
    He, Qile
    Ghobadian, Abby
    Gallear, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 18 (03) : 229 - 248
  • [4] Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer
    Inkpen, AC
    Tsang, EWK
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 30 (01): : 146 - 165
  • [5] The Optimal Contract for Complemented Knowledge Sharing between Partners in Knowledge Alliance in the Competitive Market
    Ma Yanan
    Diao Lilin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF HANGZHOU CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (MOT 2008), 2008, : 104 - 107
  • [6] Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners (vol 45, pg 691, 2008)
    Becerra, M.
    Lunnan, R.
    Huemer, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (05) : 1024 - 1024
  • [7] Knowledge Transfer Model within Strategic Alliance in Telecommunication Industries
    Zhao, Yang
    Tan, Jie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [8] The Research of Relationship between Social Capital and Corporate Knowledge's Transfer and Innovation
    Zhang, Han
    Xu, Erming
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 10992 - +
  • [9] The research of relationship between social capital and corporate knowledge's transfer and innovation
    Xu, Erming
    Zhang, Han
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-RISK MANAGEMENT (ICERM 2008), 2008, : 342 - +
  • [10] A Social Knowledge Management Framework for Harnessing Collective Knowledge Capital of Senior Citizens
    Bandyopadhyay, Somprakash
    Banerjee, Shrabastee
    Bardhan, Arina
    Dey, Priyadarshini
    Das, Srimoyee
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2015), 2015, : 14 - 22