Comparison between the clinical efficacy of platelet concentrates, derived from buffy coat and apheresis in tumor patients

被引:2
|
作者
Hao, Baolan [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
Shao, Shujun [1 ]
Dong, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Blood Transfus, Affiliated Canc Hosp, 127 Dongming Rd, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
platelet; platelet concentrates; apheresis platelet concentrates; platelet transfusion efficiency; CORRECTED COUNT INCREMENT; TRANSFUSION REFRACTORINESS; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2017.6270
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy between manual buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PCs) and automated apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) in terms of their therapeutic effects. The corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated according to detected differences in platelet concentration in patients who underwent transfusion of APCs, prepared by an automated system (group I, 72 cases) or PCs derived from buffy coat by manual method (group II, 83 cases). The clinical efficacy was assessed in terms of the CCI and clinical symptoms. The platelet contents of all the PCs were detected before transfusion. The mean 1 h CCI was 13.56 +/- 4.45 and 24 h CCI was 8.67 +/- 4.21 in group I, while the mean 1 h CCI was 15.83 +/- 4.65 and 24 h CCI was 9.57 +/- 3.36 in group II. The effective rates judged by CCI for groups I and II were 53 and 64%, respectively, and those judged by clinical symptoms were 67 and 60%, respectively. In conclusion, the clinical effectiveness of manual PCs was similar to that for APCs; thus, it could be utilized for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1448
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Platelet activation of platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis methods
    Ali, Soleimany Ferizhandy
    TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2011, 44 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [2] Platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis:: biochemical and functional differences
    Böck, M
    Rahrig, S
    Kunz, D
    Lutze, G
    Heim, MU
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2002, 12 (05) : 317 - 324
  • [3] Comparison of Therapeutic Effect of Apheresis Platelets and Buffy Coat-Derived Platelet Concentrates
    Wang, Zhaolong
    Chen, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Yangmin
    Lu, Hairong
    Ren, Lifen
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2024, 70 (08) : 1452 - 1456
  • [4] Quality of platelet concentrates derived by platelet rich plasma, buffy coat and Apheresis
    Vasconcelos, E
    Figueiredo, AC
    Seghatchian, J
    TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2003, 29 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [5] Therapeutic Effect of Apheresis and Buffy Coat-Derived Platelet Concentrates
    Zimmermann, Robert
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2024, 70 (08) : 1431 - 1433
  • [6] Cytokines in platelet concentrates: A comparison of apheresis platelet (Haemonetics) and filtered and unfiltered pooled buffy-coat derived platelet concentrates
    Seghatchian, MJ
    Wadhwa, M
    Thorpe, R
    TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1997, 18 (01): : 103 - 107
  • [7] Platelet storage lesion in interim platelet unit concentrates: A comparison with buffy-coat and apheresis concentrates
    Singh, Sukhi
    Hakimi, Caroline Shams
    Jeppsson, Anders
    Hesse, Camilla
    TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2017, 56 (06) : 870 - 874
  • [8] Quantification of Residual Red Blood Cells in Platelet Concentrates Derived from Buffy Coat and Apheresis
    de Grandmont, M.
    Beausejour, A.
    Ducas
    Jacques, A.
    Richard, M.
    Daoud, H.
    Thibault, L.
    TRANSFUSION, 2011, 51 : 58A - 58A
  • [9] Metabolomic analysis of platelets during storage: a comparison between apheresis- and buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates
    Paglia, Giuseppe
    Sigurjonsson, Olafur E.
    Rolfsson, Ottar
    Hansen, Morten Bagge
    Brynjolfsson, Sigurdur
    Gudmundsson, Sveinn
    Palsson, Bernhard O.
    TRANSFUSION, 2015, 55 (02) : 301 - 313
  • [10] Buffy-coat-derived pooled platelet concentrates and apheresis platelet concentrates: which product type should be preferred?
    Schrezenmeier, H.
    Seifried, E.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2010, 99 (01) : 1 - 15