Conditioned taste aversion learning Implications for animal models of drug abuse

被引:58
|
作者
Davis, Catherine M. [1 ]
Riley, Anthony L. [1 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Dept Psychol, Psychopharmacol Lab, Washington, DC 20016 USA
来源
ADDICTION REVIEWS 2 | 2010年 / 1187卷
关键词
conditioned taste aversion; drug abuse; aversion; reward; animal models; ETHANOL-REINFORCED BEHAVIOR; SELF-ADMINISTERED COCAINE; RAT STRAIN DIFFERENCES; PLACE PREFERENCE; LITHIUM-CHLORIDE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; GENETIC-DIFFERENCES; PREVIOUS EXPOSURE; LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY; ALCOHOL-DRINKING;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05147.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Drugs of abuse are typically discussed in terms of their rewarding effects and how these effects mediate drug taking. However, these drugs produce aversive effects that could have an important role in the overall acceptability of a drug and its likelihood of being self-administered. Rewarding and aversive effects, then, could be interpreted as separate behavioral effects, with the balance of the two determining overall drug acceptability. Interestingly, the role of aversive effects on drug acceptability in the self-administration preparation has received limited attention in this context. This chapter examines the aversive effects of drugs and discusses their role in drug taking. If these aversive effects serve a protective function, manipulations that alter or decrease these effects could have implications for drug taking. Several factors have been reported to alter conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning, a preparation used in the assessment of the aversive effects of drugs in general. Two of these factors, drug history and strain, are reviewed here. By reviewing these, we intend to demonstrate the protective nature of aversive effects in the initiation and escalation of drug taking and to provide evidence that reductions in aversive effects could produce changes in patterns of drug self-administration that could lead to an increased vulnerability to abuse drugs by altering the reward aversion balance. The aim of this chapter is not to question the importance of rewarding effects in self-administration but rather to provide evidence that aversive effects are an important factor that needs to be considered in discussions of drug-taking behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 275
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability
    Lin, Jian-You
    Arthurs, Joe
    Reilly, Steve
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 45 : 28 - 45
  • [2] Conditioned taste aversion and drugs of abuse: History and interpretation
    Verendeev, Andrey
    Riley, Anthony L.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (10): : 2193 - 2205
  • [3] Odor of taste stimuli in conditioned "taste" aversion learning
    Capaldi, ED
    Hunter, MJ
    Privitera, GJ
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 118 (06) : 1400 - 1408
  • [4] CONDITIONED TASTE AVERSION - ROUTE OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION
    COUSSENS, WR
    [J]. CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1974, 7 (03): : 267 - 267
  • [5] CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION AND TRADITIONAL LEARNING
    KLOSTERHALFEN, S
    KLOSTERHALFEN, W
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1985, 47 (02): : 71 - 94
  • [6] Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigm
    Welzl, H
    D'Adamo, P
    Lipp, HP
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 125 (1-2) : 205 - 213
  • [7] ANTAGONISM OF DRUG DISCRIMINATION-LEARNING WITHIN THE CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION PROCEDURE
    STEVENSON, GW
    POURNAGHASH, S
    RILEY, AL
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 41 (01) : 245 - 249
  • [8] EARLY LEARNING AND RETENTION OF A CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION
    ADER, R
    PECK, JH
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 1977, 10 (03) : 213 - 218
  • [9] Amiloride is a poor conditioned stimulus in taste aversion learning
    Markison, S
    Spector, AC
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1995, 20 (06) : 185 - 185
  • [10] DRUG EXPOSURE AND ACQUISTION AND RETENTION OF A CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION
    RILEY, AL
    JACOBS, WJ
    LOLORDO, VM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 90 (08): : 799 - 807