Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic

被引:232
|
作者
Kulkarni, Girish S. [1 ]
Hermanns, Thomas [1 ]
Wei, Yanliang [1 ]
Bhindi, Bimal [1 ]
Satkunasivam, Raj [1 ]
Athanasopoulos, Paul [1 ]
Bostrom, Peter J. [1 ]
Kuk, Cynthia [2 ]
Li, Kathy [1 ]
Templeton, Arnoud J. [1 ]
Sridhar, Srikala S. [1 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. [3 ]
Chung, Peter [1 ]
Bristow, Robert G. [1 ]
Milosevic, Michael [1 ]
Warde, Padraig [1 ]
Fleshner, Neil E. [1 ]
Jewett, Michael A. S. [1 ]
Bashir, Shaheena [1 ]
Zlotta, Alexandre R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
COMBINED-MODALITY THERAPY; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; PRESERVATION; GUIDELINES; SURGEON; TIME; TA;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeMultidisciplinary management improves complex treatment decision making in cancer care, but its impact for bladder cancer (BC) has not been documented. Although radical cystectomy (RC) currently is viewed as the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), radiotherapy-based, bladder-sparing trimodal therapy (TMT) that combines transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy for radiation sensitization, and external beam radiotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. In the absence of randomized studies, this study compared the oncologic outcomes between patients treated with RC or TMT by using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis.MethodsData from patients treated in a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic (MDBCC) from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Those who received TMT for MIBC were identified and matched (for sex, cT and cN stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, Charlson comorbidity score, treatment date, age, carcinoma in situ status, and hydronephrosis) with propensity scores to patients who underwent RC. Overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling and a competing risk analysis, respectively.ResultsA total of 112 patients with MIBC were included after matching (56 who had been treated with TMT, and 56 who underwent RC). The median age was 68.0 years, and 29.5% had stage cT3/cT4 disease. At a median follow-up of 4.51 years, there were 20 deaths (35.7%) in the RC group (13 as a result of BC) and 22 deaths (39.3%) in the TMT group (13 as a result of BC). The 5-year DSS rate was 73.2% and 76.6% in the RC and TMT groups, respectively (P = .49). Salvage cystectomy was performed in 6 (10.7%) of 56 patients who received TMT.ConclusionIn the setting of a MDBCC, TMT yielded survival outcomes similar to those of matched patients who underwent RC. Appropriately selected patients with MIBC should be offered the opportunity to discuss various treatment options, including organ-sparing TMT.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A propensity score analysis of radical cystectomy versus bladder-sparing trimodal therapy in the setting of a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Wei, Yanliang
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    Bostrom, Peter
    Kuk, Cynthia
    Li, Kathy
    Erlich, Annette
    Templeton, Arnoud J.
    Sridhar, Srikala S.
    Van der Kwast, Theodorus
    Chung, Peter W. M.
    Bristow, Robert G.
    Milosevic, Michael F.
    Warde, Padraig Richard
    Fleshner, Neil Eric
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    Bashir, Shaheena
    Zlotta, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [2] Re: Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic
    El-Achkar, Adnan
    Kassouf, Wassim
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (05) : 810 - 811
  • [3] Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Kumar, A.
    Cherry, D. R.
    Deka, R.
    Nalawade, V.
    Efstathiou, J. A.
    Stewart, T. F.
    Rose, B. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E873 - E874
  • [4] Trimodality bladder-sparing approach versus radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer
    AlGizawy, Samy M.
    Essa, Hoda H.
    Abdel-Wanis, Mostafa E.
    Raheem, Ahmed M. Abdel
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2014, 13 (04) : 428 - 437
  • [5] Bladder-sparing trimodal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Khalifa, J.
    Roumiguie, M.
    Pouessel, D.
    Sargos, P.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2022, 26 (6-7): : 771 - 778
  • [6] Utility of Bladder-Sparing Therapy vs Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Choudhury, Ananya
    Kiltie, Anne E.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (02) : 184 - 185
  • [7] Cystectomy versus trimodal therapy for bladder cancer
    Stoeckle, Michael
    UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (11): : 1177 - 1185
  • [8] Bladder-Sparing Therapy as an Alternative to Cystectomy Commentary on organ-sparing Therapy in Bladder Cancer
    Burger, Maximilian
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (05): : 615 - 615
  • [9] Utility of Bladder-Sparing Therapy vs Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Reply
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Kamat, Ashish M.
    Mehta, Hemalkumar B.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (02) : 186 - 186
  • [10] Comparison of outcomes between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Byun, Sang Jun
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Hong, Beom-Sik
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Lee, Jae-Lyun
    Kim, Young Seok
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (40) : 68996 - 69004