Effect of KNO3 sprays to flowering mango trees on fruit retention, fruit size, tree yield, and fruit quality

被引:4
|
作者
Oosthuyse, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Merensky Technol Serv, ZA-0835 Duivelskloof, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.455.46
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In South Africa, the mango cultivars 'Tommy Atkins,' 'Kent,' and 'Heidi' retain few fruit relative to the cultivars 'Sensation,' 'Irwin,' and 'Keitt.' In the present study, the effect on fruit retention, fruit size, tree yield, and fruit quality of applications of KNO3 to trees of the former cultivars whilst they were flowering was investigated. A KNO3 spray at 2 or 4% was administered either once during the flowering period, i.e., when the inflorescences were in bloom, or twice during this period, i.e., when the inflorescences were actively extending and subsequently when they were in bloom. In 'Tommy Atkins', the greatest increase in fruit retention occurred following the single application at 4%. In 'Heidi', two applications at 4% each gave rise to the greatest increase, and in 'Kent', two applications at 2% each increased fruit retention the most. In every cultivar, slight reductions in average fruit weight (final fruit size) were associated with the increases in fruit retention found. KNO3 increased tree yield in each cultivar. The greatest increases in yield corresponded with the greatest increases in fruit retention found. There was no apparent effect of the KNO3 sprays on fruit quality (ground skin colouration, total soluble solids content, pH, or taste on ripening). Inflorescence application of KNO3 to the cultivars in question is now adopted commercially in South Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 366
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spray Application of KNO3, Low Biuret Urea, and Growth Regulators and Hormones during and after Flowering on Fruit Retention, Fruit Size and Yield of Mango
    Oosthuyse, S. A.
    [J]. X INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 2015, 1075 : 135 - 141
  • [2] Effects of paclobutrazol and KNO3 over flowering and fruit quality in two cultivars of mango Manila
    Rebolledo-Martinez, Andres
    Lid del Angel-Perez, Ana
    Rey Moreno, Jose
    [J]. INTERCIENCIA, 2008, 33 (07) : 518 - 522
  • [3] Effect of time and severity of fruit thinning on fruit retention, fruit size, yield, and revenue in 'Sensation' mango
    Oosthuyse, SA
    Jacobs, G
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, (455): : 441 - 448
  • [4] The effect of fruit thinning and tree pruning on tree starch reserves and on fruit retention of "sensation" mango trees
    Davie, SJ
    Stassen, PJC
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, (455): : 160 - 166
  • [5] Effect of soil applied paclobutrazol on fruit retention, fruit size, tree yield and tree revenue in 'Sensation' and 'Tommy Atkins' mango
    Oosthuyse, SA
    Jacobs, G
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, (455): : 431 - 440
  • [6] Effect of air temperature on mango tree yield and fruit quality
    Sobrinho, JE
    Menezes, JB
    Leitao, MMVBR
    Souza, TH
    Melo, FC
    Machado, FLC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 2004, (645): : 189 - 194
  • [7] Improved fruit retention, yield and fruit quality in mango with exogenous application of polyamines
    Malik, Aman Ullah
    Singh, Zora
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2006, 110 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [8] Effect of postharvest sprays of boron and urea on yield and fruit quality of apple trees
    Wojcik, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2006, 29 (03) : 441 - 450
  • [9] Effects of pruning on flowering, yield and fruit quality in mango (Mangifera indica)
    Yeshitela, T
    Robbertse, PJ
    Stassen, PJC
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2005, 45 (10) : 1325 - 1330
  • [10] Effect of gibberellic acid, urea and KNO3 on yield and on composition and nutritional quality of clementine mandarin fruit juice
    El-Otmani, M
    Ait-Oubahou, A
    El-Hassainate, F
    Kaanane, A
    Lovatt, CJ
    [J]. CITRUS AND OTHER SUBTROPICAL AND TROPICAL FRUIT CROPS: ISSUES, ADVANCES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2004, (632): : 149 - 157