Efficient groundwater remediation system design subject to uncertainty using robust optimization

被引:27
|
作者
Ricciardi, Karen L.
Pinder, George F.
Karatzas, George P.
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Math, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[3] Tech Univ Crete, Dept Environm Engn, GR-73100 Khania, Greece
关键词
ground-water management; operation costs; optimization; optimization models; algorithms; hydrology; hydrologic models; remedial action; uncertainty principles;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:3(253)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many groundwater remediation designs for contaminant plume containment are developed using mathematically based groundwater flow models. These mathematical models are most effective as predictive tools when the parameters that govern groundwater flow are known with a high degree of certainty. The hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer, however, is uncertain, and so remediation designs developed using models employing one realization of the hydraulic conductivity field have an associated risk of failure of plume containment. To account for model uncertainty attributable to hydraulic conductivity in determining an optimal groundwater remediation design for plume containment, a method of optimization called robust optimization is utilized. This method of optimization is a multi-scenario approach whereby multiple hydraulic conductivity fields are examined simultaneously. By examining these fields simultaneously, the variability of the uncertainty is included in the model. To increase the efficiency of the. robust optimization approach, a sampling technique is developed that allows the modeler to determine the minimum number of field realizations necessary to achieve a reliable remediation design.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 263
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Groundwater Remediation System Designs with Flow and Concentration Constraints Subject to Uncertainty
    Ricciardi, Karen L.
    Pinder, George F.
    Karatzas, George P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2009, 135 (02): : 128 - 137
  • [2] Uncertainty-based multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design
    Singh, Abhishek
    Minsker, Barbara S.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (02)
  • [3] Groundwater remediation design under uncertainty using genetic algorithms
    Hilton, ABC
    Culver, TB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2005, 131 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [4] The role of uncertainty in the optimization of groundwater remediation systems
    Huang, C
    Mayer, AS
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES XI, VOL 1: COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SUBSURFACE FLOW AND TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 1996, : 359 - 366
  • [5] Effects of Stochastic Simulations on Multiobjective Optimization of Groundwater Remediation Design under Uncertainty
    Yang, Yun
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Luo, Qiankun
    Zhang, Tao
    Wu, Jichun
    Wang, Jinguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (08)
  • [6] Optimal Groundwater Remediation Under Uncertainty Using Multi-objective Optimization
    Aristotelis Mantoglou
    George Kourakos
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2007, 21 : 835 - 847
  • [7] Optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty using multi-objective optimization
    Mantoglou, Aristotelis
    Kourakos, George
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (05) : 835 - 847
  • [8] Role of risk and uncertainty in groundwater remediation design.
    Minsker, BS
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 220 : U318 - U318
  • [9] Risk based groundwater remediation design using a tunneling optimization algorithm
    Ricciardi, KL
    Pinder, GF
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR SUBSURFACE FLOW AND TRANSPORT - COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, SURFACE WATER SYSTEMS AND HYDROLOGY, 2000, : 519 - 523
  • [10] Using remediation time as an optimization variable in groundwater remediation systems
    Endres, KL
    Mayer, AS
    [J]. Computational Methods in Water Resources, Vols 1 and 2, 2004, 55 : 1171 - 1180