Comparison of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus under outpatient-clinic conditions for 18 months using a basal-bolus regimen with a rapid-acting insulin analogue as mealtime insulin

被引:27
|
作者
Siegmund, T.
Weber, S.
Blankenfeld, H.
Oeffner, A.
Schumm-Draeger, P.-M.
机构
[1] Teaching Hosp Munich Bogenhausen, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Vasc Med, D-81925 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med 1, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
type 2 diabetes mellitus; basal-bolus regimen; glycaernic control; outpatient treatment; insulin glargine;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-973082
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess the effects of a Structured inpatient diabetes training programme in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen using insulin glargine or NPH insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogues with respect to glycaemic control, weight development and incidence of hypoglycaemia in an outpatient-clinic setting. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, single centre, comparative observational study including 119 subjects. Prestudy treatment was a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin and a rapid-acting insulin analogue. Subjects either continued with NPH insulin (n = 56) or were switched over to insulin glargine (n = 63) at the discretion of the investigator (aiming at equal numbers in each group). Patients then attended routine out-patient follow up visits for 18 months. Results: HbAlc in the insulin glargine group improved statistically significant by -0.49%; [95%CI, -0.26, -0.71; p < 0.001; HbA1c at endpoint 6.95 +/- 0.71 %], whereas in the NPH group the reduction by -0.12% [95%CI, -0.31, 0.06; p = 0.189; HbA1c at endpoint 7.22 +/- 0.74%] was statistically not significant. After 18 months of treatment the difference between treatment groups was 0.37% (p<0.015). Mean weight gain was significantly higher in the NPH group than in the glargine group (2.1 vs. 0.25 kg; p = 0.025). A lower risk of hypoglycaemia in the glargine group (0.50 vs. 0.71 episodes/patient/month) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.081). Conclusions: Following a structured in-patient diabetes training programme glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen improved significantly only with insulin glargine suggesting that training alone may not be sufficient to further improve metabolic control in relatively well controlled patients on NPH insulin. Therefore, in addition to a structured training programme also the insulin regimen should be optimized, e.g. by introduction of an insulin analogue.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:349 / 353
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RAPID-ACTING INSULIN ANALOGUES IN BASAL-BOLUS REGIMENS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Garg, Satish
    Javier Ampudia-Blasco, Francisco
    Pfohl, Martin
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (03) : 486 - 505
  • [2] Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine using a basal-bolus regimen in a randomized, controlled clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Raskin, Philip
    Gylvin, Titus
    Weng, Wayne
    Chaykin, Louis
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2009, 25 (06) : 542 - 548
  • [3] Insulin deglucec, a new generation ultra-long acting insulin, in a mealtime plus basal regimen in people with type 1 diabetes: comparison to insulin glargine
    Meneghini, L.
    Home, E.
    DeVries, J. H.
    Jendle, J.
    Endahl, L.
    Lyby, K.
    Johansen, T.
    Roberts, A.
    Ratner, R.
    Wendisch, U.
    Birkeland, K. I.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53
  • [4] Insulin Degludec, a New Generation Ultra-Long Acting Insulin, in a Mealtime plus Basal Regimen in People with Type 1 Diabetes:Comparison to Insulin Glargine
    Meneghini, Luigi F.
    Home, Philip D.
    Wendisch, Ulrich
    Ratner, Robert E.
    Endahl, Lars A.
    Johansen, Thue
    Lyby, Karsten
    Jendle, Johan H.
    Roberts, Anthony P.
    Devries, J. Hans
    Birkeland, Kare I.
    DIABETES, 2010, 59 : A152 - A152
  • [5] Rationale for using combinations of short-acting insulin analogue and NPH insulin at mealtime in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus
    Bolli, GB
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1999, 12 : 737 - 744
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK
    Evans, M.
    Wolden, M.
    Gundgaard, J.
    Chubb, B.
    Christensen, T.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 18 (01) : 56 - 68
  • [8] Effectiveness of one-year insulin glargine and insulin glulisine basal-bolus treatment in people with type 2 diabetes
    Jermendy Gyorgy
    Kovacs Gabor
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (50) : 2122 - 2128
  • [9] Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin: a prospective 18 months comparison in Type 2 diabetic patients with a multiple injection regimen.
    Siegmund, T
    Born, T
    Weber, S
    Usadel, KH
    Schumm-Draeger, PM
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2003, 46 : A272 - A272
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro as part of a basal-bolus insulin regimen in children and adolescents with type I diabetes mellitus
    Philotheou, A.
    Arslanian, S.
    Blatniczky, L.
    Peterkova, V.
    Souhami, E.
    Danne, T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2008, 51 : S382 - S382