Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility

被引:35
|
作者
Rahman, Mahabubur [1 ]
Angeles Rodriguez-Serrano, M. [2 ]
Lambkin, Mary [3 ]
机构
[1] Rennes Sch Business, Dept Mkt, Rennes, France
[2] Univ Pablo de Olavide, Dept Business Org & Mkt, Seville, Spain
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Smurfit Grad Business Sch, Blackrock, Co Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Brand equity; Firm performance; Corporate social responsibility; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; MODERATING ROLE; GLOBAL BRANDS; PANEL-DATA; MARKET; STRATEGY; IMPACT; GREEN; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1057/s41262-019-00155-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have demonstrated the impact of corporate brand equity on firm performance but have not yet investigated moderating effects on this relationship from other dimensions of firm strategy. This study puts forward a contingency model of the relationship between corporate brand equity and firm performance and investigates the moderating effect of one important contingency variable which is the firm's corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy. It is tested on a panel dataset of 62 US firms/corporate brands. The results of this study corroborate previous evidence that corporate brand equity has a significant positive impact on market-based performance, measured by market share, as well as on financial performance, measured by Tobin's q. In addition, the findings indicate that CSR plays a complementary role, positively moderating the relationship between corporate brand equity and firm performance. That is, there is a synergistic connection between brand equity and CSR which increases long-term value over and above the direct impact of corporate brand equity.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 704
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility
    Mahabubur Rahman
    M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano
    Mary Lambkin
    Journal of Brand Management, 2019, 26 : 691 - 704
  • [2] The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand equity and firm performance
    Wang, David Han-Min
    Chen, Pei-Hua
    Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang
    Hsiao, Chih-Yi
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2015, 68 (11) : 2232 - 2236
  • [3] The impact of corporate social responsibility on brand equity
    Yang, Jing
    Basile, Kelly
    MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2019, 37 (01) : 2 - 17
  • [4] The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation
    Chi-Shiun Lai
    Chih-Jen Chiu
    Chin-Fang Yang
    Da-Chang Pai
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 95 : 457 - 469
  • [5] The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation
    Lai, Chi-Shiun
    Chiu, Chih-Jen
    Yang, Chin-Fang
    Pai, Da-Chang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 95 (03) : 457 - 469
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility, firm performance, and firm risk: the role of firm reputation
    Liu, Min
    Lu, Weijie
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, : 525 - 545
  • [7] The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions in Brand Equity, Brand Credibility, Brand Reputation, and Purchase Intentions
    Wang, Shu
    Liao, Ying-Kai
    Wu, Wann-Yih
    Le, Khanh Bao Ho
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [8] The mediating role of corporate social responsibility in corporate governance and firm performance
    Xu, Ella Guangxin
    Graves, Chris
    Shan, Yuan George
    Yang, Joey W.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 375
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm-Based Brand Equity: The Moderating Effect of Marketing Communication and Brand Identity
    Alakkas, Abdullah A.
    Vivek
    Paul, Mohinder
    Nabi, Mohammed Kamalun
    Khan, Mohammed Arshad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [10] LINKING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY WITH REPUTATION AND BRAND OF THE FIRM
    Lu, Jintao
    Ren, Licheng
    He, Yifan
    Lin, Wenfang
    Streimikis, Justas
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2019, 21 (51) : 442 - 460