Box- or Virtual-Reality Trainer: Which Tool Results in Better Transfer of Laparoscopic Basic Skills?-A Prospective Randomized Trial

被引:30
|
作者
Brinkmann, Christian [1 ]
Fritz, Mathias [1 ]
Pankratius, Ulrich [1 ]
Bande, Ralf [1 ]
Neumann, Philipp [1 ]
Schlueter, Steffen [1 ]
Senninger, Norbert [1 ]
Rijcken, Emile [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
education; simulation training; computer simulation; GOALS; laparoscopy; prospective studies; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING-CURVE; SIMULATION; ACQUISITION; CURRICULUM; SYSTEMS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.009
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Simulation training improves laparoscopic performance. Laparoscopic basic skills can be learned in simulators as box- or virtual-reality (VR) trainers. However, there is no clear recommendation for either box or VR trainers as the most appropriate tool for the transfer of acquired laparoscopic basic skills into a surgical procedure. DESIGN: Both training tools were compared, using validated and well-established curricula in the acquirement of basic skills, in a prospective randomized trial in a 5-day structured laparoscopic training course. Participants completed either a box- or VR-trainer curriculum and then applied the learned skills performing an ex situ laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a pig liver. The performance was recorded on video and evaluated offline by 4 blinded observers using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score. Learning curves of the various exercises included in the training course were compared and the improvement in each exercise was analyzed. SETTING: Surgical Skills Lab of the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Muenster. PARTICIPANTS: Surgical novices without prior surgical experience (medical students, n = 36). RESULTS: Posttraining evaluation showed significant improvement compared with baseline in both groups, indicating acquisition of laparoscopic basic skills. Learning curves showed almost the same progression with no significant differences. In simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, total GOALS score was significantly higher for the box-trained group than the VR-trained group (box: 15.31 +/- 3.61 vs. VR 12.92 +/- 3.06; p = 0.039; Hedge's 0.699), indicating higher technical skill levels. CONCLUSIONS: Despite both systems having advantages and disadvantages, they can both be used for simulation training for laparoscopic skills. In the setting with 2 structured, validated and almost identical curricula, the box-trained group appears to be superior in the better transfer of basic skills into an experimental but structured surgical procedure. (C) 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 735
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Skills Maintenance: A Randomized Trial of Virtual Reality and Box Trainer Simulators
    Khan, Montaha W.
    Lin, Diwei
    Marlow, Nicholas
    Altree, Meryl
    Babidge, Wendy
    Field, John
    Hewett, Peter
    Maddern, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 71 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [2] Assessment of basic laparoscopic skills on virtual reality simulator or box trainer
    Brinkman, Willem M.
    Tjiam, Irene M.
    Buzink, Sonja N.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (10): : 3584 - 3590
  • [3] Assessment of basic laparoscopic skills on virtual reality simulator or box trainer
    Willem M. Brinkman
    Irene M. Tjiam
    Sonja N. Buzink
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 3584 - 3590
  • [4] Acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills using box trainer and virtual reality simulator
    Vitish-Sharma, P.
    Onuba, L.
    Patel, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 162 - 162
  • [5] Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer
    Mathilde Maagaard
    Jette Led Sorensen
    Jeanett Oestergaard
    Torur Dalsgaard
    Teodor P. Grantcharov
    Bent S. Ottesen
    Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 722 - 727
  • [6] Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer
    Maagaard, Mathilde
    Sorensen, Jette Led
    Oestergaard, Jeanett
    Dalsgaard, Torur
    Grantcharov, Teodor P.
    Ottesen, Bent S.
    Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (03): : 722 - 727
  • [7] Learning Basic Laparoscopic Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Box Trainer, Virtual Reality Simulator, and Mental Training
    Mulla, Mubashir
    Sharma, Davendra
    Moghul, Masood
    Kailani, Obeda
    Dockery, Judith
    Ayis, Salma
    Grange, Philippe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [8] Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills
    Newmark, Jordan
    Dandolu, Vani
    Milner, Richard
    Grewal, Harsh
    Harbison, Sean
    Hernandez, Enrique
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (05) : 546.e1 - 546.e4
  • [9] Acquisition of fundamental laparoscopic skills: Is a box really as good as a virtual reality trainer?
    Vitish-Sharma, P.
    Knowles, J.
    Patel, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 9 (08) : 659 - 661
  • [10] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills
    Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
    Cheung, Vincent Y. T.
    Pun, Ting Chung
    Tung, Wai Kit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (03) : 310 - 316