Adolescents' perceptions of cycling versus walking to school: Understanding the New Zealand context

被引:73
|
作者
Mandic, Sandra [1 ]
Hopkins, Debbie [2 ]
Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia [3 ]
Flaherty, Charlotte [4 ]
Williams, John [5 ]
Sloane, Leiana [1 ]
Moore, Antoni [6 ]
Spence, John C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Phys Educ Sport & Exercise Sci, Act Living Lab, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Transport Studies Unit, Oxford, England
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, Participatory Res McGill, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Dunedin City Council, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Mkt, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Otago, Sch Surveying, Dunedin, New Zealand
[7] Univ Alberta, Fac Phys Educ & Recreat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Adolescent; Physical activity; Active transportation; Walking; Cycling; Theory of planned behaviour; ACTIVE TRAVEL; OLDER ADOLESCENTS; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; TRANSPORT; MODE; DETERMINANTS; MAINTENANCE; ENVIRONMENT; DISTANCE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jth.2016.10.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cycling to school is less common than walking in many developed countries. This cross-sectional study compared correlates and perceptions of walking versus cycling to school in Dunedin adolescents living <= 4 km from school. Methods: Adolescents (n=764; 44.6% males; 15.2 +/- 1.4 years) from 12 secondary schools completed an online survey about perceptions of walking and cycling to school. Distance to school was calculated using Geographic Information Systems network analysis. Results: Overall, 50.8% of adolescents walked and 2.1% cycled to school, 44.1% liked cycling for recreation and 58.8% were capable/able/confident to cycle to school. Adolescents expressed more positive experiential (walking: 45.9%; cycling: 34.9%) and instrumental beliefs (walking: 74.2%; cycling: 59.2%) towards walking versus cycling to school (p < 0.001). Compared to walking, adolescents reported that cycling to school was perceived as less safe by themselves (cycling vs walking; 61.3% vs 89.8%) and their parents (71.4% vs 88.6%) and was less encouraged by their parents (23.0% vs 67.0%), peers (18.8% vs 48.4%) and schools (19.5% vs 30.8%) (all p < 0.001). The route to school had fewer cycle paths compared to footpaths (37.2% vs 91.0%; p < 0.001). Cycle friendly uniforms (41.4%), safer bicycle storage at school (40.1%), slower traffic (36.4%), bus bicycle racks (26.2%) and bicycle ownership (32.7%) would encourage cycling to school. Conclusions: Compared to walking, cycling to school among Dunedin adolescents was less common, perceived as less safe and had less social and infrastructure support. Future interventions should focus on creating supportive physical and social environments, and improving road safety for cyclists in New Zealand. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADOLESCENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF SCHOOL NEIGHBOURHOOD BUILT ENVIRONMENT FOR WALKING AND CYCLING TO SCHOOL
    Rahman, Mohammad Lutfur
    Moore, Antoni
    Mandic, Sandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2022, 25
  • [2] Adolescents' perceptions of school neighbourhood built environment for walking and cycling to school
    Lutfur Rahman, Mohammad
    Moore, Antoni B.
    Mandic, Sandra
    [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2022, 88 : 111 - 121
  • [3] Travel to school patterns and perceptions of walking to school in New Zealand adolescents before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Mandic, Sandra
    Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia
    Coppell, Kirsten J.
    Keall, Michael
    Smith, Melody
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Sandretto, Susan
    Wilson, Gordon
    Kidd, Gavin
    Flaherty, Charlotte
    Mindell, Jennifer S.
    Stephenson, Janet
    King, Kimberley
    Kentala, Kaisa
    Rolleston, Anna
    Spence, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2024, 36
  • [4] School Bag-Related Factors and Their Implications for Walking and Cycling to School among New Zealand Adolescents
    Mandic, Sandra
    Kentala, Kaisa
    Situmorang, Margaretha Liliana
    Rahman, Mohammad Lutfur
    King, Kimberley
    Garcia Bengoechea, Enrique
    Fox, Ann-Maree
    Oliveira, Ricardo
    Coppell, Kirsten J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [5] Adolescents' perceptions of walking and cycling to school differ based on how far they live from school
    Mandic, Sandra
    Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Coppell, Kirsten
    Spence, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2022, 24
  • [6] A tale of two New Zealand cities: Cycling to school among adolescents in Christchurch and Dunedin
    Frater, Jillian
    Williams, John
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Flaherty, Charlotte
    Moore, Antoni
    Kingham, Simon
    Kuijer, Roeline
    Mandic, Sandra
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 49 : 205 - 214
  • [7] Personal, Social and Environmental Factors Influencing Adolescents' Walking to School in Dunedin, New Zealand
    Mandic, Sandra
    Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia
    Williams, John
    Mountfort, Ashley
    Brook, Emily
    Flaherty, Charlotte
    Spence, John C.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 526 - 526
  • [8] Walking and Cycling to School Predictors of Increases Among Children and Adolescents
    Hume, Clare
    Timperio, Anna
    Salmon, Jo
    Carver, Alison
    Giles-Corti, Billie
    Crawford, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (03) : 195 - 200
  • [9] How do perceptions of local neighborhood relate to adolescents' walking and cycling?
    Carver, A
    Salmon, J
    Campbell, K
    Baur, L
    Garnett, S
    Crawford, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2005, 20 (02) : 139 - 147
  • [10] Differences in parental perceptions of walking and cycling to high school according to distance
    Mandic, Sandra
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia
    Flaherty, Charlotte
    Coppell, Kirsten
    Moore, Antoni
    Williams, John
    Spence, John C.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 71 : 238 - 249