Validation of a mammographic image quality modification algorithm using 3D-printed breast phantoms

被引:6
|
作者
Boita, Joana [1 ,2 ]
Mackenzie, Alistair [3 ]
van Engen, Ruben E. [2 ]
Broeders, Mireille [2 ,4 ]
Sechopoulos, Ioannis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Med Imaging, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening LRCB, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Royal Surrey NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Coordinating Ctr Phys Mammog, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Hlth Evidence, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
digital mammography; virtual clinical trials; image quality; image simulation; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER-DETECTION; DOSE REDUCTION; DETECTOR; DETECTABILITY; LOCALIZATION; LESIONS; IMPACT; NOISE; MASS;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.033502
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To validate a previously proposed algorithm that modifies a mammogram to appear as if it was acquired with different technique factors using realistic phantom-based mammograms. Approach: Two digital mammography systems (an indirect- and a direct-detector-based system) were used to acquire realistic mammographic images of five 3D-printed breast phantoms with the technique factors selected by the automatic exposure control and at various other conditions (denoted by the original images). Additional images under other simulated conditions were also acquired: higher or lower tube voltages, different anode/filter combinations, or lower tube current-time products (target images). The signal and noise in the original images were modified to simulate the target images (simulated images). The accuracy of the image modification algorithm was validated by comparing the target and simulated images using the local mean, local standard deviation (SD), local variance, and power spectra (PS) of the image signals. The absolute relative percent error between the target and simulated images for each parameter was calculated at each sub-region of interest (local parameters) and frequency (PS), and then averaged. Results: The local mean signal, local SD, local variance, and PS of the target and simulated images were very similar, with a relative percent error of 5.5%, 3.8%, 7.8%, and 4.4% (indirect system), respectively, and of 3.7%, 3.8%, 7.7%, and 7.5% (direct system), respectively. Conclusions: The algorithm is appropriate for simulating different technique factors. Therefore, it can be used in various studies, for instance to evaluate the impact of technique factors in cancer detection using clinical images. (C) 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of Image Restoration Methods on 3D-Printed Ultrasound Phantoms
    Fuzesi, Kriszian
    Basarab, Adrian
    Cserey, Gyorgy
    Kouame, Denis
    Gyongy, Miklos
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2017,
  • [2] Quality control of radiomic features using 3D-printed CT phantoms
    Mahmood, Usman
    Apte, Aditya
    Kanan, Christopher
    Bates, David D. B.
    Corrias, Giuseppe
    Manneli, Lorenzo
    Oh, Jung Hun
    Erdi, Yusuf Emre
    Nguyen, John
    O'Deasy, Joseph
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 8 (03)
  • [3] Manufacture and Testing of Anthropomorphic 3D-printed Breast Phantoms Using a Microwave Radar Algorithm Optimized for Propagation Speed
    Herrera, D. Rodriguez
    Reimer, T.
    Nepote, M. Solis
    Pistorius, S.
    2017 11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2017, : 3480 - 3484
  • [4] Breast phantom validation of a mammographic image modification method
    Boita, Joana
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718
  • [5] Validation of a breast density quantization software with 3D printed breast phantoms
    Solis, N.
    Fedon, C.
    Hill, M. L.
    Sechopoulosa, I
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 12031
  • [6] Liver Phantoms Cast in 3D-Printed Mold for Image-Guided Procedures
    Elisei, Radu Claudiu
    Graur, Florin
    Melzer, Andreas
    Moldovan, Sever Calin
    Tiu, Calin
    Popa, Calin
    Mois, Emil
    Pisla, Doina
    Vaida, Calin
    Stedanescu, Horia
    Cote, Adrian
    Al-Hajjar, Nadim
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (14)
  • [7] Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Breast Phantoms With 3D-Printed Anatomical Structure for Microwave Imaging of Breast Cancer
    Zerrad, Fatima-Ezzahra
    Taouzari, Mohamed
    Makroum, El Mostafa
    Ahmad, Sarosh
    Alkurt, Fatih O.
    Karaaslan, Muharrem
    Islam, Md Tarikul
    Hussein, Mousa, I
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 96896 - 96908
  • [8] 3D-Printed Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications
    Cloonan, Aidan J.
    Shahmirzadi, Danial
    Li, Ronny X.
    Doyle, Barry J.
    Konofagou, Elisa E.
    McGloughlin, Tim M.
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2014, 1 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [9] Gyroid structures for 3D-printed heterogeneous radiotherapy phantoms
    Tino, R.
    Leary, M.
    Yeo, A.
    Brandt, M.
    Kron, T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (21):
  • [10] A Quantitative Analysis of the Plastic Shell Effects in 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms for Microwave Imaging
    Reimer, Tyson
    Christie, Spencer
    Pistorius, Stephen
    2022 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2022,