External seismic stability of vertical geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls using pseudo-static method

被引:11
|
作者
Ruan, Xiaobo [1 ]
Sun, Shulin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Earth Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
External stability; Pseudo-static method; Required minimum reinforcement length; Seismic coefficient; Vertical GRS walls; RETAINING WALLS; EARTH PRESSURE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-013-0241-8
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Analysis of external stability of vertical geosynthetic- reinforced soil (GRS) walls is very important in the seismic prone zone. The scope of this paper is to obtain required minimum reinforcement length, L-min, for external seismic stability of vertical GRS walls by pseudo-static limit equilibrium method. Then, L-min can be calculated to resist sliding, eccentricity, and bearing capacity failure modes. The parameters considered include both horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients (k(h) and k(v)), surcharge load (q), wall height (H) and the properties of retained backfill, GRS, and foundation soil. Results show that L-min against sliding failure mode, L-min,L-S, increases more quickly than that against the other two failure modes with the increase in k(h), q, or unit weight of retained backfill, gamma(b), while L-min,L-S decreases more quickly than that against the other two failure modes with increase in friction angle of retained backfill, phi(b), or unit weight of GRS, gamma(r). For the different failure modes, the effect of k(v) on L-min is not identical with the change of k(h), and in addition, L-min/H will tend to remain unchanged with the increase in H. In general, L-min against bearing capacity failure mode, L-min,L-BC, is larger than L-min against the other two failure modes. However, L-min,(BC) will be less than L-min against eccentricity failure mode, L-min,L-E, for k(h) exceeding 0.35, or friction angle of foundation soil, phi(f), exceeding 37 degrees, and L-min,L-BC will also be less than L-min,L-S for friction angle of GRS, phi(r), being no more than 26 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1095
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External seismic stability of vertical geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls using pseudo-static method
    Xiaobo Ruan
    Shulin Sun
    Acta Geotechnica, 2014, 9 : 1085 - 1095
  • [3] Pseudo-static internal stability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced earth slopes using horizontal slices method
    Hesari, Saeed Aroni
    Javankhoshdel, Sina
    Payan, Meghdad
    Chenari, Reza Jamshidi
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (05): : 1417 - 1442
  • [4] Effects of seismic amplification on the stability design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Ge, Bin
    Ruan, Huaining
    Shu, Shuang
    Zhang, Fei
    Gao, Yufeng
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2022, 50 (05) : 881 - 895
  • [5] Reliability analysis for internal seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Chehade, H. Alhajj
    Guo, X.
    Dias, D.
    Sadek, M.
    Jenck, O.
    Chehade, F. Hage
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 30 (03) : 296 - 314
  • [6] Japanese experiences on seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Koseki, Junichi
    Kuwano, Jiro
    NEW FRONTIERS IN CHINESE AND JAPANESE GEOTECHNIQUES, 2007, : 46 - 56
  • [7] External stability of waterfront reinforced soil structures under seismic conditions using a pseudo-static approach
    Choudhury, D.
    Ahmad, S. M.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [8] Seismic behaviour of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Tatsuoka, F
    GEOSYNTHETICS ASIS'97 (SELECT PAPERS), 1998, : 137 - 144
  • [9] On the seismic performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Di Filippo, G.
    Biondi, G.
    Moraci, N.
    GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 1197 - 1203
  • [10] Geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Crouse, PE
    Wu, JTH
    SOIL MECHANICS 2003: SOILS, GEOLOGY, AND FOUNDATIONS, 2003, (1849): : 53 - 58