Performance evaluation of AR4 Climate Models in simulating daily precipitation over the Indian region using skill scores

被引:29
|
作者
Anandhi, Aavudai [1 ]
Nanjundiah, Ravi S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Indian Inst Sci, Ctr Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[3] Indian Inst Sci, Divecha Ctr Climate Change, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GLOBAL COUPLED MODEL; ASIAN SUMMER MONSOON; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; RAINFALL; TEMPERATURE; VARIABILITY; PROJECTIONS; EXTREMES; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s00704-013-1043-5
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The ability of Coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs) participating in the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change's fourth assessment report (IPCC AR4) for the 20th century climate (20C3M scenario) to simulate the daily precipitation over the Indian region is explored. The skill is evaluated on a 2.5A degrees x 2.5A degrees grid square compared with the Indian Meteorological Department's (IMD) gridded dataset, and every GCM is ranked for each of these grids based on its skill score. Skill scores (SSs) are estimated from the probability density functions (PDFs) obtained from observed IMD datasets and GCM simulations. The methodology takes into account (high) extreme precipitation events simulated by GCMs. The results are analyzed and presented for three categories and six zones. The three categories are the monsoon season (JJASO - June to October), non-monsoon season (JFMAMND - January to May, November, December) and for the entire year ("Annual"). The six precipitation zones are peninsular, west central, northwest, northeast, central northeast India, and the hilly region. Sensitivity analysis was performed for three spatial scales, 2.5A degrees grid square, zones, and all of India, in the three categories. The models were ranked based on the SS. The category JFMAMND had a higher SS than the JJASO category. The northwest zone had higher SSs, whereas the peninsular and hilly regions had lower SS. No single GCM can be identified as the best for all categories and zones. Some models consistently outperformed the model ensemble, and one model had particularly poor performance. Results show that most models underestimated the daily precipitation rates in the 0-1 mm/day range and overestimated it in the 1-15 mm/day range.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 566
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条