CRITICAL ISSUES IN RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION, COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION, AND SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION: AN EXPERT WHITE PAPER CONSENSUS

被引：105

作者：

Hale, J. ^{[1
]}

Alfonso, V. ^{[1
]}

Berninger, V. ^{[1
]}

Bracken, B. ^{[1
]}

Christo, C. ^{[1
]}

Clark, E. ^{[1
]}

Cohen, M. ^{[1
]}

Davis, A. ^{[1
]}

Decker, S. ^{[1
]}

Denckla, M. ^{[1
]}

Dumont, R. ^{[1
]}

Elliott, C. ^{[1
]}

Feifer, S. ^{[1
]}

Fiorello, C. ^{[1
]}

Flanagan, D. ^{[1
]}

Fletcher-Janzen, E. ^{[1
]}

Geary, D. ^{[1
]}

Gerber, M. ^{[1
]}

Gerner, M. ^{[1
]}

Goldstein, S. ^{[1
]}

Gregg, N. ^{[1
]}

Hagin, R. ^{[1
]}

Jaffe, L. ^{[1
]}

Kaufman, A. ^{[1
]}

Kaufman, N. ^{[1
]}

Keith, T. ^{[1
]}

Kline, F. ^{[1
]}

Kochhar-Bryant, C. ^{[1
]}

Lerner, J. ^{[1
]}

Marshall, G. ^{[1
]}

Mascolo, J. ^{[1
]}

Mather, N. ^{[1
]}

Mazzocco, M. ^{[1
]}

McCloskey, G. ^{[1
]}

McGrew, K. ^{[1
]}

Miller, D. ^{[1
]}

Miller, J. ^{[1
]}

Mostert, M. ^{[1
]}

Naglieri, J. ^{[1
]}

Ortiz, S. ^{[1
]}

Phelps, L. ^{[1
]}

Podhajski, B. ^{[1
]}

Reddy, L. ^{[1
]}

Reynolds, C. ^{[1
]}

Riccio, C. ^{[1
]}

Schrank, F. ^{[1
]}

Schultz, E. ^{[1
]}

Semrud-Clikeman, M. ^{[1
]}

Shaywitz, S. ^{[1
]}

Simon, J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada

来源：

LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY | 2010年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

READING DISABILITIES; INTEGRATING RESPONSE; COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT; DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; CHILDREN; DISCREPANCY; INSTRUCTION; DEFICITS; MODEL; RTI;

D O I：

10.1177/073194871003300310

中图分类号：

G76 [特殊教育];

学科分类号：

040109 ;

摘要：

Developed in concert with the Learning Disabilities Association of America (LDA), this White Paper regarding specific learning disabilities identification and intervention represents the expert consensus of 58 accomplished scholars in education, psychology, medicine, and the law. Survey responses and empirical evidence suggest that five conclusions are warranted: 1) The SLD definition should be maintained and the statutory requirements in SLD identification procedures should be strengthened; 2) neither ability-achievement discrepancy analysis nor failure to respond to intervention alone is sufficient for SLD identification; 3) a "third method" approach that identifies a pattern of psychological processing strengths and weaknesses, and achievement deficits consistent with this pattern of processing weaknesses, makes the most empirical and clinical sense; 4) an empirically-validated RTI model could be used to prevent learning problems, but comprehensive evaluations should occur for SLD identification purposes, and children with SLD need individualized interventions based on specific learning needs, not merely more intense interventions; and 5) assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological processes should be used for both SLD identification and intervention purposes.

引用

页码：223 / 236

页数：14

共 17 条

[1] Critical Issues in Response-to-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus
[J]. LEARNING DISABILITIES-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (02) : 61 - 72
[2] IDENTIFICATION OF GIFTED STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES IN A RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION ERA
Crepeau-Hobson, Franci
Bianco, Margarita
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2011, 48 (02) : 102 - 109
[3] Response to Intervention and the Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities
Reschly, Daniel J.
[J]. TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 2014, 34 (01) : 39 - 58
[4] Ethical anal legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities
Burns, Matthew K.
Jacob, Susan
Wagner, Angela R.
[J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 46 (03) : 263 - 279
[5] RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION IN HIGH-RISK PRESCHOOLS: CRITICAL ISSUES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Ball, Carrie R.
Trammell, Beth A.
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2011, 48 (05) : 502 - 512
[6] Response to intervention and the identification of specific learning disabilities: Why we need comprehensive evaluations as part of the process
Ofiesh, Nicole
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2006, 43 (08) : 883 - 888
[7] Response-to-intervention: Separating the rhetoric of self-congratulation from the reality of specific learning disability identification
Kavale, Kenneth A.
Kauffman, James M.
Bachmeier, Randy I.
LeFever, Gretchen B.
[J]. LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2008, 31 (03) : 135 - 150
[8] Response to Intervention: Early Identification of Students with Learning Disabilities
Cakiroglu, Orhan
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2015, 7 (01) : 170 - 182
[9] Specific learning disabilities and the response to intervention model: A systematic review
Suarez Rodriguez, Jose Adrian
Gonzalez-Sanchez, Lorena
Areces, Debora
Garcia, Trinidad
Rodriguez, Celestino
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY SOCIETY & EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (02): : 67 - 75
[10] Does the Response-to-Intervention Model Fundamentally Alter the Traditional Conceptualization of Specific Learning Disability?
John H. Kranzler
Melina Yaraghchi
Katherine Matthews
Luis Otero-Valles
[J]. Contemporary School Psychology, 2020, 24 (1) : 80 - 88

← 1 2 →