Delayed-interval delivery: Extended series from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice

被引:50
|
作者
Farkouh, LJ [1 ]
Sabin, ED [1 ]
Heyborne, KD [1 ]
Lindsay, LG [1 ]
Porreco, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] Obstetrix Med Grp Colorado, Denver, CO USA
关键词
cervical cerclage; delayed-interval delivery; multichorionicity;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2000.107319
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to review the extended experience of a single maternal-fetal medicine practice with delayed-interval delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We completed a retrospective review of our maternal-fetal medicine practice database from January 1991 through March 1999. Patients were derived from both primary and consultative practices. All patients were managed with tocolysis, antibiotics, and cerclage after delivery of the first fetus(es). Retained siblings were investigated by amniocentesis to exclude intra-amniotic infection. RESULTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients had attempted delayed-interval delivery. Exclusion criteria for delayed-interval delivery included monochorionicity, abruptio placentae, severe preeclampsia, and the need for hysterotomy The mean latency interval was 36 days, with a range of 3 to 123 days. Additionally, patients with previous cerclage(s) had significantly shorter mean latency intervals than patients without previous cerclage(s). Patients with long latency intervals (greater than or equal to 49 days) had earlier births of the first fetus. CONCLUSION: Selected multichorionic pregnancies may benefit from delayed-interval delivery. Patients with previous cervical cerclage(s) during the index pregnancy are less likely to achieve significant latency intervals. Even modest intervals between births of siblings at critical gestational ages can improve neonatal survival and decrease neonatal morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1503
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Best practice in maternal-fetal medicine
    Di Renzo, Gian Carlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 128 (01) : 80 - 82
  • [2] Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes after Delayed-Interval Delivery of Multifetal Pregnancies
    Roman, Ashley S.
    Fishman, Shira
    Fox, Nathan
    Klauser, Chad
    Saltzman, Daniel
    Rebarber, Andrei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) : 91 - 95
  • [3] ChatGPT in maternal-fetal medicine practice: comment
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (07)
  • [4] ChatGPT in maternal-fetal medicine practice: comment
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Saade, George
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (10)
  • [5] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #51: Thromboembolism prophylaxis for cesarean delivery
    Pacheco, Luis D.
    Saade, George
    Metz, Torri D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (02) : B11 - B17
  • [6] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #51: thromboembolism prophylaxis for cesarean delivery
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    D'Alton, Mary
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : 243 - 244
  • [7] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Dashe, Jodi S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (05) : 615 - 619
  • [8] Maternal-Fetal Medicine physicians' practice patterns for 22-week delivery management
    Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker
    McKenzie, Fatima
    Robinson, Barrett K.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (11): : 1829 - 1833
  • [9] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #59: The use of analgesia and anesthesia for maternal-fetal procedures
    Norton, Mary E.
    Cassidy, Arianna
    Ralston, Steven J.
    Chatterjee, Debnath
    Farmer, Diana
    Beasley, Anitra D.
    Dragoman, Monica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 225 (06) : B2 - B8
  • [10] The distribution, practice, and attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine specialists
    Coustan, DR
    Schwartz, RM
    Gagnon, DE
    VanDorsten, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) : 1218 - 1225