共 26 条
- [2] A Comparison Between National Healthcare Safety Network Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting versus Traditional Surveillance for Clostridium difficile Infection INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02): : 125 - 131
- [3] Comparison of 2 Clostridium difficile Surveillance Methods: National Healthcare Safety Network's Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting Module versus Clinical Infection Surveillance INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03): : 284 - 290
- [4] Quantifying Sources of Bias in National Healthcare Safety Network Laboratory-Identified Clostridium difficile Infection Rates INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01): : 1 - 7
- [5] Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection Surveillance: National Healthcare Safety Network's Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting versus Traditional Laboratory-Confirmed Bloodstream Infection Surveillance INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10): : 1286 - 1289
- [6] Immediate impact of healthcare-facility-onset Clostridium difficile laboratory-identified events reporting methodology change on standardized infection ratios INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (12): : 1484 - 1486
- [7] Failure of Risk-Adjustment by Test Method for C. difficile Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01): : 109 - 111
- [9] The use of laboratory-identified event surveillance to classify adverse outcomes due to Clostridioides difficile infection in Canadian long-term care facilities INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (05): : 557 - 564
- [10] Potential for the current National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) >3 days after admission definition of laboratory-identified, healthcare-facility-onset, Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) to overestimate rates INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04): : 467 - 468