Searching for Expert or Peer Advice in Online Forums

被引:0
|
作者
Meservy, Thomas O. [1 ]
Fadel, Kelly J. [2 ]
Jensen, Matthew [3 ]
Matthews, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
Forum; expert; peer; content analysis; advice; information search; qualitative;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Online forums sponsored by electronic networks of practice provide a valuable resource for information seekers, where posted questions may be answered by both subject matter experts and ordinary (peer) forum users. Extant research on the relative influence of these two forum information sources has produced equivocal results, finding that experts are preferred in some circumstances and peers in others. This study applied a qualitative approach using an open-ended survey to better understand preferences for peer or expert advice on online forums. Open, axial, and content coding of 97 survey responses revealed 10 distinct preference characteristics for peer advice and six for expert advice, with personal experience emerging as the leading characteristic for peer input and specialized knowledge for expert input. Codes were further classified into an organizing conceptual framework of person, problem, or solution dimensions, and a cluster analysis revealed common profiles information seekers use for selecting advice on forums.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advice on life? Online fan forums as a space for peer-to-peer sex and relationships education
    Masanet, Maria-Jose
    Buckingham, David
    [J]. SEX EDUCATION-SEXUALITY SOCIETY AND LEARNING, 2015, 15 (05): : 486 - 499
  • [2] Expert ranking techniques for online rated forums
    Faisal, Muhammad Shahzad
    Daud, Ali
    Akram, Abubakr Usman
    Abbasi, Rabeeh Ayaz
    Aljohani, Naif Radi
    Mehmood, Irfan
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2019, 100 : 168 - 176
  • [3] Identifying peer experts in online health forums
    Vydiswaran, V. G. Vinod
    Reddy, Manoj
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (Suppl 3)
  • [4] Identifying peer experts in online health forums
    V.G.Vinod Vydiswaran
    Manoj Reddy
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19
  • [5] Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy
    Lobban, Fiona
    Coole, Matthew
    Donaldson, Emma
    Glossop, Zoe
    Haines, Jade
    Johnston, Rose
    Jones, Steven H.
    Lodge, Christopher
    Machin, Karen
    Marshall, Paul
    Meacock, Rachel
    Penhaligon, Kate
    Rakic, Tamara
    Rawsthorne, Mat
    Rayson, Paul
    Robinson, Heather
    Rycroft-Malone, Jo
    Semino, Elena
    Shryane, Nick
    Wise, Sara
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [6] DCA for online prediction with expert advice
    Hoai An Le Thi
    Vinh Thanh Ho
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (15): : 9521 - 9544
  • [7] DCA for online prediction with expert advice
    Hoai An Le Thi
    Vinh Thanh Ho
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33 : 9521 - 9544
  • [8] Online Active Learning with Expert Advice
    Hao, Shuji
    Hu, Peiying
    Zhao, Peilin
    Hoi, Steven C. H.
    Miao, Chunyan
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, 2018, 12 (05)
  • [9] GIRLS' PEER SEX COUNSELING IN ONLINE DISCUSSION FORUMS
    Doering, Nicola
    Prinzellner, Yvonne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 : 322 - 322
  • [10] Peer training in expert searching: the observation effect
    Vieira, DL
    Dunn, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2005, 93 (01) : 69 - 73