Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review

被引:7
|
作者
Naemi, Roya [1 ,2 ]
Barikani, Hamid Reza [3 ]
Shahmoradi, Leila [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Allied Med Sci, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Ardebil, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dent Implant Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] FDA, Halal Res Ctr IRI, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Database management systems; dental implants; registries; SURVIVAL RATES; MEDICAL SCIENCES; PART I; HEALTH; FAILURES; DISEASES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.4103/jehp.jehp_1302_20
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well-documented. However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries to explain the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic study was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. For evaluating dental implant quality registers, all studies in the English language were examined with no time limitation. Case reports, conference abstracts, and letters to the editor were excluded. The analysis of the quality of the studies was done by the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. RESULTS: The primary search identified 5565 articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria and reviewing 40 full texts, 11 studies were included in this study. In this review, seven countries as Sweden, the USA, Canada, Germany, Finland, Australia, and South Korea had dental implant quality registers. Furthermore, the goals of dental implant quality registers were classified into the categories of research, epidemiology, administrative, clinical, and surveillance. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide dentists and other stakeholders useful information on the existed dental implant quality registers and databases worldwide. It also provides a framework of the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registry. The establishment of dental implant quality register will be beneficial for societies and also allows them to control the complications of dental implants in future.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neonatal abstinence syndrome: a systematic review of current databases and registries
    Zakerabasali, Somayyeh
    Safdari, Reza
    Kadivar, Maliheh
    Rostam Niakan Kalhori, Sharareh
    Mokhtaran, Mehrshad
    Karbasi, Zahra
    Sayarifard, Azadeh
    Abhari, Shahabeddin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (06): : 979 - 992
  • [2] Lessons Learned From Breast Implant Registries A Systematic Review
    Wurzer, Paul
    Hundeshagen, Gabriel
    Cambiaso-Daniel, Janos
    Fischer, Sebastian
    Hoflehner, Helmut
    Spendel, Stephan
    Lumenta, David B.
    Kamolz, Lars P.
    Kneser, Ulrich
    Hirche, Christoph
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 83 (06) : 722 - 725
  • [3] Guided Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review
    Dioguardi, Mario
    Spirito, Francesca
    Quarta, Cristian
    Sovereto, Diego
    Basile, Elisabetta
    Ballini, Andrea
    Caloro, Giorgia Apollonia
    Troiano, Giuseppe
    Lo Muzio, Lorenzo
    Mastrangelo, Filiberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [4] Bone Quality and Quantity and Dental Implant Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    Wennerberg, Ann
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (03) : 219 - 237
  • [5] Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Lee, Peter
    Chin, Ken
    Liew, Danny
    Stub, Dion
    Brennan, Angela L.
    Lefkovits, Jeffrey
    Zomer, Ella
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [6] Evidence of data quality in trauma registries: A systematic review
    Porgo, Teegwende Valerie
    Moore, Lynne
    Tardif, Pier-Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 80 (04): : 648 - 658
  • [7] Clinical registries and quality measurement in surgery: A systematic review
    Stey, Anne M.
    Russell, Marcia M.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Sacks, Greg D.
    Dawes, Aaron J.
    Gibbons, Melinda M.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2015, 157 (02) : 381 - 395
  • [8] Characteristics and Quality of National Cardiac Registries: A Systematic Review
    Dawson, Luke P.
    Biswas, Sinjini
    Lefkovits, Jeffrey
    Stub, Dion
    Burchill, Luke
    Evans, Sue M.
    Reid, Christopher
    Eccleston, David
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2021, 14 (09): : E007963
  • [9] Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: A systematic review
    Song, Dandan
    Shujaat, Sohaib
    Politis, Constantinus
    Orhan, Kaan
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 49 (05) : 573 - 585
  • [10] Zirconia as a Dental Implant Abutment Material: A Systematic Review
    Nakamura, Keisuke
    Kanno, Taro
    Milleding, Percy
    Ortengren, Ulf
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2010, 23 (04) : 299 - 309