The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing

被引:93
|
作者
Marsh, Elizabeth J.
Roediger, Henry L., III
Bjork, Robert A.
Bjork, Elizabeth L.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03194051
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The present article addresses whether multiple-choice tests may change knowledge even as they attempt to measure it. Overall, taking a multiple-choice test boosts performance on later tests, as compared with non-tested control conditions. This benefit is not limited to simple definitional questions, but holds true for SAT 11 questions and for items designed to tap concepts at a higher level in Bloom's (1956) taxonomy of educational objectives. Students, however, can also learn false facts from multiple-choice tests; testing leads to persistence of some multiple-choice lures on later general knowledge tests. Such persistence appears due to faulty reasoning rather than to an increase in the familiarity of lures. Even though students may learn false facts from multiple-choice tests, the positive effects of testing outweigh this cost.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing
    Elizabeth J. Marsh
    Henry L. Roediger
    Robert A. Bjork
    Elizabeth L. Bjork
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 194 - 199
  • [2] Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests
    Fazio, Lisa K.
    Agarwal, Pooja K.
    Marsh, Elizabeth J.
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (04) : 407 - 418
  • [3] Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests
    Lisa K. Fazio
    Pooja K. Agarwal
    Elizabeth J. Marsh
    Henry L. Roediger
    Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38 : 407 - 418
  • [4] The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing
    Roediger, HL
    Marsh, EJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (05) : 1155 - 1159
  • [5] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    AKEROYD, FM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 61 (05) : 475 - 475
  • [6] REEXAMINATION OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    WOMER, FB
    EDUCATION, 1970, 90 (04): : 285 - 289
  • [7] THE USE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FOR TESTING
    TRIEBER, JM
    TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 1980, 34 (10): : 24 - 28
  • [8] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING IN ANATOMY
    NNODIM, JO
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1992, 26 (04) : 301 - 309
  • [9] Multiple-choice Testing: Knowledge, or Random Choice?
    Simonova, Ivana
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2014, : 819 - 823
  • [10] Inherent Limitations of Multiple-Choice Testing
    Gunderman, Richard B.
    Ladowski, Joseph M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) : 1319 - 1321