Does major agriculture production zone have higher carbon efficiency and abatement cost under climate change mitigation?

被引:22
|
作者
Zhang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Guanglai [1 ]
Li, Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Econ, Dept Econ, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Inst Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich, Norfolk, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Major agriculture production zone; Carbon emissions efficiency; Marginal abatement cost; Poyang lake eco-economic zone; DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION; CO2 EMISSION PERFORMANCE; CHINA CEMENT INDUSTRY; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; SHADOW PRICE; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; POWER-PLANTS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In this paper we investigate the carbon efficiency and abatement cost for different main functional regions in China, to WA whether major agriculture production zone has higher carbon efficiency and abatement cost than other functional regions. For this purpose, we use a global non-radial distance function to examine the efficiency and abatement cost of carbon emissions and take China's Poyang Lake Ecological Economics Zone (PLEEZ), one of China's national strategy for sustainable development, as an empirical study. By using the non-radial efficiency model, the carbon emissions efficiency indicator can be constructed. By employing the dual model of the non-radial directional distance function, the shadow prices of carbon emissions, which is interpreted as marginal abatement cost can be derived. County level data from 2009 to 2013 of the PLEEZ is used as the empirical investigation. Empirical results show that the CO2 emissions of the PLEEZ are not performing efficiently and the CO2 emissions efficiency remains at a very low level with an average value of 0.279. Meanwhile, the shadow prices of CO2 emissions are calculated, with a mean value of 11.867 yuan per ton, which is relatively low compared with other previous studies of different regions or industry and indicate that carbon emissions are not strictly regulated. Moreover, significant heterogeneities in the carbon efficiency and abatement cost are found among three major functional zones in the PLEEZ remain. Major agriculture production zone shows better carbon efficiency than key ecological function zone, but lower than key economic development zone. It is also found carbon abatement cost of major agriculture production zone is lower than key economic development zone indicating the less pressure under climate change mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 385
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A marginal abatement cost curve for climate change mitigation by additional carbon storage in French agricultural land
    Bamiere, L.
    Bellassen, V
    Angers, D.
    Cardinael, R.
    Ceschia, E.
    Chenu, C.
    Constantin, J.
    Delame, N.
    Diallo, A.
    Graux, A-, I
    Houot, S.
    Klumpp, K.
    Launay, C.
    Letort, E.
    Martin, R.
    Meziere, D.
    Mosnier, C.
    Rechauchere, O.
    Schiavo, M.
    Therond, O.
    Pellerin, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 383
  • [2] New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon
    Moore, Frances C.
    Baldos, Uris
    Hertel, Thomas
    Diaz, Delavane
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [3] New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon
    Frances C. Moore
    Uris Baldos
    Thomas Hertel
    Delavane Diaz
    Nature Communications, 8
  • [4] Nitrous Oxide Abatement Coupled with Biopolymer Production As a Model GHG Biorefinery for Cost-Effective Climate Change Mitigation
    Frutos, Osvaldo D.
    Cortes, Irene
    Cantera, Sara
    Arnaiz, Esther
    Lebrero, Raquel
    Munoz, Raul
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (11) : 6319 - 6325
  • [5] Brazilian beef production and GHG emission – social cost of carbon and perspectives for climate change mitigation
    Mariana Vieira da Costa
    Daniela Debone
    Simone Georges El Khouri Miraglia
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32 (9) : 5245 - 5258
  • [6] Carbon emissions efficiency and abatement cost under inter-region differentiated mitigation strategies: A modified DDF model
    Meng, Fanyi
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 532
  • [7] Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum
    Veronika Dornburg
    Gregg Marland
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2008, 13 : 211 - 217
  • [8] Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum
    Dornburg, Veronika
    Marland, Gregg
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2008, 13 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [9] Does conservation agriculture deliver climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration in tropical agro-ecosystems?
    Powlson, David S.
    Stirling, Clare M.
    Thierfelder, Christian
    White, Rodger P.
    Jat, M. L.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 220 : 164 - 174
  • [10] Agricultural productivity under climate change vulnerability: does carbon reduction paths matter for sustainable agriculture?
    Ali, Syed Rashid
    Mujahid, Nooreen
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025,