Evaluation of peri-implant condition in periodontally compromised patients

被引:7
|
作者
Scalzer Lopes, Guilherme Da Rocha [1 ]
Rodrigues Feitosa, Alfredo Carlos [2 ]
Suaid, Fabricia Ferreira [2 ]
Melo De Matos, Jefferson David [1 ]
Lucena De Vasconcelos, John Eversong [4 ]
De Azevedo Vaz, Sergio Lins [3 ]
Andrade, Valdir Cabral [5 ]
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [1 ]
Goncalves Guerra, Selva Maria [3 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Espiirito Santo Ufes, Dept Periodont, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Espiirito Santo Ufes, Dept Dent, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[4] Caririense Postgrad Ctr, Dept Dent, Juazeiro Do Norte, CE, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora, Dept Dent, Governador Valadares, MG, Brazil
来源
关键词
Implants; mucositis; peri-implantitis; periodontal diseases; risk factors; PREVALENCE; HEALTHY; 9-YEAR;
D O I
10.4103/jips.jips_197_19
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aims: The aim of the study is to evaluate the profile of peri-implant tissues in periodontally compromised patients.Settings and Design: In vivo - cross sectional study design.Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight implants were evaluated, clinically and radiographically, installed in seven individuals treated by the same team of professionals, during the years 1997 and 2005 in a private dental clinic in Vitoria, ES, Brazil; that time of data collection, all implants were at least 10 years of functional loading. The variables related to the dental implants evaluated were: visible Plaque Index, Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and bone level, to relate them to the classification of dental implants.Statistical Analysis Used: The Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test were adopted. Results: The total of 58 implants were classified: 11 (18.9%) as healthy and 12 (20.7%) as clinically stable. The other 35 implants (60.4%) had some type of peri-implant inflammation, 20 of them (34.5%) were diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis and 15 (25.9%) with peri-implantitis. Among the variables studied, the results showed statistically significant differences for implant location (P = 0.001) and GBI (P = 0.03). Most of the maxillary implants (85.7%) were classified for some type of peri-implant disease. For the implants which resulted in Score 1 for GBI, most of them (75.0%) were also classified for some type of peri-implant disease.Conclusions: Dental implants placed in periodontally compromised patients may have high long-term survival rates. However, most implants were classified with some type of peri-implant inflammation.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of smoking on peri-implant marginal bone loss in periodontally compromised patients
    Meric, Pinar
    Gurlek, Onder
    Kanmaz, Burcu
    Buduneli, Nurcan
    [J]. TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2018, 16 : 34 - 35
  • [2] Peri-implant Crestal Bone Changes Around Zirconia Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Compromised Patients
    Kniha, Kristian
    Milz, Stefan
    Kniha, Heinz
    Ayoub, Nassim
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Modabber, Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (01) : 217 - 222
  • [3] Long-Term Results of Peri-implant Conditions in Periodontally Compromised Patients Following Lateral Bone Augmentation
    Keeve, Philip L.
    Khoury, Fouad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 137 - 146
  • [4] A retrospective cohort study on peri-implant complications in implants up to 10 years of functional loading in periodontally compromised patients
    Pandolfi, Andrea
    Rinaldo, Francesca
    Pasqualotto, Debora
    Sorrentino, Fabiola
    La Torre, Giuseppe
    Guerra, Fabrizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 91 (08) : 995 - 1002
  • [5] Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Peri-Implant Pathology in Systemic Compromised Patients
    Neves, Joana
    Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
    Oliveira, Pedro
    dos Santos, Jose Martins
    Malo, Paulo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (05): : 409 - 415
  • [6] Implant survival in periodontally compromised patients
    Baelum, V
    Ellegaard, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (10) : 1404 - 1412
  • [7] Implant therapy in periodontally compromised patients
    Ellegaard, B
    Baelum, V
    Karring, T
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) : 180 - 188
  • [8] Peri-implant conditions in periodontally compromised patients following maxillary sinus augmentation - A long-term post-therapy trial
    Buchmann, R
    Khoury, F
    Faust, C
    Lange, DE
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [9] The Role of Occlusion in the Dental Implant and Peri-implant Condition: A Review
    Graves, Carmen V.
    Harrel, Steve K.
    Rossmann, Jeffrey A.
    Kerns, David
    Gonzalez, Jorge A.
    Kontogiorgos, Elias D.
    Al-Hashimi, Ibtisam
    Abraham, Celeste
    [J]. OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2016, 10 : 594 - 601
  • [10] Periodontal and peri-implant microbiota in patients with healthy and inflamed periodontal and peri-implant tissues
    Zhuang, Long-Fei
    Watt, Rory M.
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Si, Mi-Si
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (01) : 13 - 21