A finite element model for impact simulation with laminated glass

被引:174
|
作者
Timmel, M.
Kolling, S. [1 ]
Osterrieder, P.
Du Bois, P. A.
机构
[1] DaimlerChrysler AG, EP SPB, D-71059 Sindelfingen, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Struct Mech, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Cottbus, D-03044 Cottbus, Germany
关键词
safety glass; windscreen; hyperelasticity; explicit FEM; short-time dynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.07.008
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A computational technique for the modelling of laminated safety glass is presented using an explicit finite element solver. Coincident finite elements are used to model the layered set-up of laminated glass: shell elements with brittle failure for the glass components and membrane elements to simulate the ultimate load carrying capacity of the PVB-interlayer. Two different approaches are considered to model laminated glass: a physical model and a smeared model. In the physical model the glass is considered as elastic/brittle and the interlayer as a hyperelastic material. For the hyperelastic description of the interlayer, we give an overview of material models, which are widely used for explicit solvers, i.e. the laws by Blatz-Ko, Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden. The obtained stress-strain curves are fitted to experimental results of the interlayer. The hyperelastic model is applied to a simple impact test demonstrating the numerical robustness. In the smeared model, we use two shell elements of equal thickness with elasto-plastic material properties to obtain an improved bending response after fracture. For validation, experimental investigations have been carried out where a spherical impactor was shot against a windscreen. The acceleration of the impactor has been measured in this test and is compared to the numerical results. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1478
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure criterion for laminated glass under impact loading and its application in finite element simulation
    Pyttel, T.
    Liebertz, H.
    Cai, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (04) : 252 - 263
  • [2] Improvement of windshield laminated glass model for finite element simulation of head-to-windshield impacts
    Prasongngen, J.
    Putra, I. P. A.
    Koetniyom, S.
    Carmai, J.
    9TH THAI SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (TSME-ICOME 2018), 2019, 501
  • [3] A simple mixed finite element model for laminated glass beams
    Baraldi, Daniele
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2018, 194 : 611 - 623
  • [4] Finite element modelling of impact damage in polyvinyl butyral laminated glass
    Chen, Shunhua
    Zang, Mengyan
    Wang, Di
    Zheng, Zumei
    Zhao, Chunlai
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 138 : 1 - 11
  • [5] FINITE-ELEMENT SIMULATION OF IMPACT TESTS OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE PLATES
    LAKSHMINARAYANA, HV
    BOUKHILI, R
    GAUVIN, R
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 1994, 28 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [6] Finite element model based on refined plate theories for laminated glass units
    Zemanova, Alena
    Zeman, Jan
    Sejnoha, Michal
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 12 (06): : 1158 - 1181
  • [7] Simulation of impact fracture behavior of laminated glass using discrete element method
    Oda, Juhachi
    Zang, Mengyan
    Tohyama, Kiyofumi
    Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, A Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A, 1997, 63 (607): : 630 - 635
  • [8] Rectangular Plate Finite Element for Triplex Laminated Glass
    Ivanov, Ivelin
    Velchev, Dimitar
    Georgiev, Nikolay
    Ivanov, Ivo
    CHALLENGING GLASS 3, 2012, : 679 - 690
  • [9] Finite Element Simulation of Interlaminar and Intralaminar Damage in Laminated Composite Plates Subjected to Impact
    Soroush, M.
    Fard, K. Malekzadeh
    Shahravi, M.
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 15 (06):
  • [10] Soft impact responses of laminated glass simulated with the combined finite-discrete element method
    Chen, Xudong
    Chan, Andrew
    ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2018, 35 (03) : 1460 - 1480