Risks to conservation of species in the wild from promoting ex situ management: Response to Farhadinia et al. 2020 Comment

被引：3
|
作者：
Khalatbari, Leili [1 ,2 ,3 ]
O'Neill, Helen M. K. [4 ]
Ostrowski, Stephane [5 ]
Yusefi, Gholam Hosein [1 ,2 ]
Ghoddousi, Arash [6 ]
Abolghasemi, Hamed [7 ]
Breitenmoser-Wursten, Christine [8 ]
Breitenmoser, Urs [8 ,9 ]
Brito, Jose Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Durant, Sarah M. [10 ]
机构：
[1] Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources, CIBIO, InBIO, Vairao, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Porto, Portugal
[3] Mohitban Soc, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury, Kent, England
[5] Wildlife Conservat Soc WCS, Bronx, NY USA
[6] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany
[7] Rafsanjan, Freelance Conservationist, Kerman, Iran
[8] IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Grp, Muri, Switzerland
[9] Univ Bern, Ctr Fish & Wildlife Hlth, Bern, Switzerland
[10] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London, England
来源：
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY | 2021年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/cobi.13786
中图分类号：
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号：
090705 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1327 / 1330
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endangered species management and the role of conservation genetics: A response to Barr et al.
    Zink, Robert M.
    Jones, Andrew W.
    Farquhar, C. Craig
    Westberg, Michael C.
    Gonzalez Rojas, Jose I.
    AUK, 2011, 128 (04): : 794 - 797
  • [2] Statistical matching for conservation science revisited: response to Schleicher et al. 2020
    Rasolofoson, Ranaivo A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (06)
  • [3] Comment: Novak et al. (2021) overestimated the successes of species translocations and minimized their risks
    Strayer, David L.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (07)
  • [4] Ex Situ Sumatran Rhinoceros Conservation and the Agony of Choice. An Integration with the Management Strategy Proposed by Brandt et al. (2018)
    Gippoliti, Spartaco
    Robovsky, Jan
    JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2018, 109 (07) : 830 - 831
  • [5] Use of ex situ management not necessarily a last resort: Reply to Khalatbari et al. 2021
    Farhadinia, Mohammad S.
    Johnson, Paul J.
    Zimmermann, Alexandra
    McGowan, Philip J. K.
    Meijaard, Erik
    Stanley-Price, Mark
    Macdonald, David W.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 1331 - 1333
  • [6] A full and authentic reckoning of species' ranges for conservation: response to Akcakaya et al. 2018
    Sanderson, Eric W.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (05) : 1208 - 1210
  • [7] Response to O'Connell et al. (2020): There are multiple ways to adapt taxonomy to conservation goals
    Rheindt, Frank E.
    Ahyong, Shane T.
    Azevedo-Santos, Valter M.
    Bertling, Markus
    Bouchard, Patrice
    Evenhuis, Neal
    Harvey, Mark
    Irham, Mohammad
    Krell, Frank-T.
    Pape, Thomas
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Prawiradilaga, Dewi M.
    Pyle, Richard
    Rasmussen, Pamela
    Welter-Schultes, Francisco
    Winker, Kevin
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30 (01) : 249 - 251
  • [8] Response to O’Connell et al. (2020): There are multiple ways to adapt taxonomy to conservation goals
    Frank E. Rheindt
    Shane T. Ahyong
    Valter M. Azevedo-Santos
    Markus Bertling
    Patrice Bouchard
    Neal Evenhuis
    Mark Harvey
    Mohammad Irham
    Frank-T. Krell
    Thomas Pape
    A. Townsend Peterson
    Dewi M. Prawiradilaga
    Richard Pyle
    Pamela Rasmussen
    Francisco Welter-Schultes
    Kevin Winker
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2021, 30 : 249 - 251
  • [9] Hysterectomy and Hormonal Dysregulation in Functional Neurological Disorder: A Comment on Stone et al., 2020 Response
    Stone, Jon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2022, 34 (03) : 277 - 277
  • [10] Distinguishing the evoked response from phase reset: A comment to Makinen et al.
    Klimesch, W
    Hanslmayr, S
    Sauseng, P
    Gruber, WR
    NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (03) : 808 - 811
12345