Ethical considerations when conducting research with people with nonverbal autism: A reflective commentary

People with severe (nonverbal) autism are significantly under researched. Physical, communication and social limitations have created misconceptions concerning their ability to engage in meaningful communication and to participate in inclusive research. Those who are nonspeaking often communicate by use of a specialised device that requires the assistance of a personal facilitator. This process, while representing the preferred and frequently only method of communication for people who do not speak, is subject to significant criticism by some scholars. Therefore, ethical and practical considerations concerning authenticity, capacity and consent require careful attention when conducting research with such populations. These factors however, must be held within a methodological design that provides space for the inclusion, respect and empowerment of research participants to ensure their voices are authentically represented. This commentary reflects on these considerations as they were addressed within a research study that used interview as a method of data collection for people with nonverbal autism.